Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083176›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2018

Finger Millet [

S Antony Ceasar, T Maharajan, T P Ajeesh Krishna, M Ramakrishnan, G Victor Roch, Lakkakula Satish, Savarimuthu Ignacimuthu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Improvement of millets in the post-genomic era.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S Antony CeasarDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College Chennai, India.
T MaharajanDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College Chennai, India.
T P Ajeesh KrishnaDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College Chennai, India.
M RamakrishnanDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College Chennai, India.
G Victor RochDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College Chennai, India.
Lakkakula SatishDepartment of Biotechnology Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.
Savarimuthu IgnacimuthuDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The whole genome sequence (WGS) of the much awaited, nutrient rich and climate resilient crop, finger millet (

Indexed as

finger milletgenomic resourcesmilletsnutrient transportwhole genome sequence (WGS)

Identifiers

PMID30083176
PMCPMC6064933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.