Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30083125›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Application of a Prediction Error Theory to Pavlovian Conditioning in an Insect.

Makoto Mizunami, Kanta Terao, Beatriz Alvarez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. One-Trial Appetitive Learning Tasks for Drug Targeting.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. How does homeostasis happen? Integrative physiological, systems biological, and evolutionary perspectives.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Makoto MizunamiFaculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Kanta TeraoGraduate School of Life Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Beatriz AlvarezFaculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elucidation of the conditions in which associative learning occurs is a critical issue in neuroscience and comparative psychology. In Pavlovian conditioning in mammals, it is thought that the discrepancy, or error, between the actual reward and the predicted reward determines whether learning occurs. This theory stems from the finding of Kamin's blocking effect, in which after pairing of a stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus (US), conditioning of a second stimulus is blocked when the two stimuli are presented in compound and paired with the same US. Whether this theory is applicable to any species of invertebrates, however, has remained unknown. We first showed blocking and one-trial blocking of Pavlovian conditioning in the cricket

Indexed as

blockingclassical conditioningcricketdopamineerror-correction learninginvertebrateoctopamineRescorla–Wagner model

Identifiers

PMID30083125
PMCPMC6064870
OpenAlexW2868976709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.