ArticleScientific reports2018
Spatial segregation of home ranges between neighbouring colonies in a diurnal raptor.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lesser kestrels of the same colony do not overwinter together.Current zoology · 2024Article
- GPS tracking analyses reveal finely-tuned shorebird space use and movement patterns throughout the non-breeding season in high-latitude austral intertidal areas.Movement ecology · 2023Article
- Large-scale movement patterns in a social vulture are influenced by seasonality, sex, and breeding region.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Foraging costs drive within-colony spatial segregation in shearwaters from two contrasting environments in the North Atlantic Ocean.Oecologia · 2022Article
- Application of GPS occurrence data to understand African white-backed vulturesEcology and evolution · 2022Article
- Vegetation height and structure drive foraging habitat selection of the lesser kestrel (PeerJ · 2022Article
- Article
- Fine-scale spatial segregation in a pelagic seabird driven by differential use of tidewater glacier fronts.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Breeding habitat loss reveals limited foraging flexibility and increases foraging effort in a colonial breeding seabird.Movement ecology · 2020Article
- Analysis of movement recursions to detect reproductive events and estimate their fate in central place foragers.Movement ecology · 2020Article
- Inter-individual differences in foraging tactics of a colonial raptor: consistency, weather effects, and fitness correlates.Movement ecology · 2020Article
- Effect of breeding performance on the distribution and activity budgets of a predominantly resident population of black-browed albatrosses.Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhancement of information transfer has been proposed as a key driver of the evolution of coloniality. Transfer of information on location of food resources implies that individuals from the same colony share foraging areas and that each colony can be associated to a specific foraging area. In colonial breeding vertebrates, colony-specific foraging areas are often spatially segregated, mitigating intercolony intraspecific competition. By means of simultaneous GPS tracking of lesser kestrels (Falco naumanni) from neighbouring colonies, we showed a clear segregation of space use between individuals from different colonies. Foraging birds from different neighbouring colonies had home ranges that were significantly more segregated in space than expected by chance. This was the case both between large and between small neighbouring colonies. To our knowledge, the lesser kestrel is the only terrestrial species where evidence of spatial segregation of home ranges between conspecifics from neighbouring colonies has been demonstrated. The observed spatial segregation pattern is consistent with the occurrence of public information transfer about foraging areas and with the avoidance of overexploited areas located between neighbouring colonies. Our findings support the idea that spatial segregation of exploited areas may be widespread among colonial avian taxa, irrespective of colony size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.