Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30082688›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Sample size effects on the assessment of eukaryotic diversity and community structure in aquatic sediments using high-throughput sequencing.

Francisco J A Nascimento, Delphine Lallias, Holly M Bik, Simon Creer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francisco J A NascimentoDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. francisco.nascimento@su.se.ORCID 0000-0003-3722-1360
Delphine LalliasGABI, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Holly M BikDepartment of Nematology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4356-3837
Simon CreerMolecular Ecology and Fisheries Genetics Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, LL57 2UW, Bangor, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3124-3550

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how biodiversity changes in time and space is vital to assess the effects of environmental change on benthic ecosystems. Due to the limitations of morphological methods, there has been a rapid expansion in the application of high-throughput sequencing methods to study benthic eukaryotic communities. However, the effect of sample size and small-scale spatial variation on the assessment of benthic eukaryotic diversity is still not well understood. Here, we investigate the effect of different sample volumes in the genetic assessment of benthic metazoan and non-metazoan eukaryotic community composition. Accordingly, DNA was extracted from five different cumulative sediment volumes comprising 100% of the top 2 cm of five benthic sampling cores, and used as template for Ilumina MiSeq sequencing of 18 S rRNA amplicons. Sample volumes strongly impacted diversity metrics for both metazoans and non-metazoan eukaryotes. Beta-diversity of treatments using smaller sample volumes was significantly different from the beta-diversity of the 100% sampled area. Overall our findings indicate that sample volumes of 0.2 g (1% of the sampled area) are insufficient to account for spatial heterogeneity at small spatial scales, and that relatively large percentages of sediment core samples are needed for obtaining robust diversity measurement of both metazoan and non-metazoan eukaryotes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiodiversityDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEcosystemEukaryotaEukaryotic CellsGeologic SedimentsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSample SizeRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID30082688
PMCPMC6078945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.