Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30082569›Full record

ReviewThe Indian journal of medical research2018

Animal models of tuberculosis: Lesson learnt.

Amit Kumar Singh, Umesh D Gupta

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Indian journal of medical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Applications of humanized mice inMolecular medicine reports · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Human lung organoids model for assessing host response toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Transcript-Capture sequencing enriches mRNA ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Journal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Host Immune Response toJournal of inflammation research · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amit Kumar SinghICMR-National JALMA Institute of Leprosy & Other Mycobacterial Diseases, Agra, India.
Umesh D GuptaICMR-National JALMA Institute of Leprosy & Other Mycobacterial Diseases, Agra, India.
National JALMA Institute for Leprosy & Other Mycobacterial Diseases · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of death globally among infectious diseases that has killed more numbers of people than any other infectious diseases. Animal models have become the lynchpin for mimicking human infectious diseases. Research on TB could be facilitated by animal challenge models such as the guinea pig, mice, rabbit and non-human primates. No single model presents all aspects of disease pathogenesis due to considerable differences in disease resistance/susceptibility between these models. Availability of a wide range of animal strains, Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains, route of infection and doses affect the disease progression and intervention outcome. Different animal models have contributed significantly to the drug and vaccine development, identification of biomarkers, understanding of TB immunopathogenesis and host genetic influence on infection. In this review, the commonly used animal models in TB research are discussed along with their advantages and limitations.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalTuberculosisAnimalsGuinea PigsHumansMiceMycobacterium tuberculosisRabbitsAnimal models - drug development - granuloma - latent model - susceptibility - tuberculosis - vaccine

Identifiers

PMID30082569
PMCPMC6094516
OpenAlexW2886886889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.