Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30082377›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

When did

James F O'Connell, Jim Allen, Martin A J Williams, Alan N Williams, Chris S M Turney, Nigel A Spooner, Johan Kamminga, Graham Brown, Alan Cooper

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. iScience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Denisovan admixture facilitated environmental adaptation in Papua New Guinean populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The role of genetic selection and climatic factors in the dispersal of anatomically modern humans out of Africa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

James F O'ConnellDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112; oconnell@anthro.utah.edu.
Jim AllenDepartment of Archaeology and History, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.
Martin A J WilliamsDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Alan N WilliamsExtent Heritage Pty Ltd, Pyrmont, NSW 2009.
Chris S M TurneyPalaeontology, Geobiology and Earth Archives Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Nigel A SpoonerSchool of Physical Sciences and Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005.
Johan KammingaDepartment of Archaeology and Natural History, School of Culture, History and Natural History, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Graham BrownMuseum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory, Darwin, NT 0801.
Alan CooperAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anatomically modern humans (

Indexed as

AfricaArchaeologyAsiaHistory, AncientHuman MigrationHumansanatomically modern humansHomo sapiensLate PleistoceneMadjedbebeSahul

Identifiers

PMID30082377
PMCPMC6112744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.