Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30082331›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2019

Low-value care in Australian public hospitals: prevalence and trends over time.

Tim Badgery-Parker, Sallie-Anne Pearson, Kelsey Chalmers, Jonathan Brett, Ian A Scott, Susan Dunn, Neville Onley, Adam G Elshaug

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patterns of diagnostic testing for oesophagogastric cancer-related symptoms in Australian primary care: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Continuing Professional Development - Medical Imaging.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tim Badgery-ParkerMenzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1275-1130
Sallie-Anne PearsonMenzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kelsey ChalmersMenzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7291-8898
Jonathan BrettMedicines Policy Research Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ian A ScottSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7596-0837
Susan DunnActivity Based Management, NSW Ministry of Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Neville OnleyActivity Based Management, NSW Ministry of Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Adam G ElshaugMenzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine 27 low-value procedures, as defined by international recommendations, in New South Wales public hospitals.

designAnalysis of admitted patient data for financial years 2010-2011 to 2016-2017.

main outcome measuresNumber and proportion of episodes identified as low value by two definitions (narrower and broader), associated costs and bed-days, and variation between hospitals in financial year 2016-2017; trends in numbers of low-value episodes from 2010-2011 to 2016-2017.

resultsFor 27 procedures in 2016-2017, we identified 5079 (narrower definition) to 8855 (broader definition) episodes involving low-value care (11.00%-19.18% of all 46 169 episodes involving these services). These episodes were associated with total inpatient costs of $A49.9 million (narrower) to $A99.3 million (broader), which was 7.4% (narrower) to 14.7% (broader) of the total $A674.6 million costs for all episodes involving these procedures in 2016-2017, and involved 14 348 (narrower) to 29 705 (broader) bed-days. Half the procedures accounted for less than 2% of all low-value episodes identified; three of these had no low-value episodes in 2016-2017. The proportion of low-value care varied widely between hospitals. Of the 14 procedures accounting for most low-value care, seven showed decreasing trends from 2010-2011 to 2016-2017, while three (colonoscopy for constipation, endoscopy for dyspepsia, sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma in situ) showed increasing trends.

conclusionsLow-value care in this Australian public hospital setting is not common for most of the measured procedures, but colonoscopy for constipation, endoscopy for dyspepsia and sentinel lymph node biopys for melanoma in situ require further investigation and action to reverse increasing trends. The variation between procedures and hospitals may imply different drivers and potential remedies.

Indexed as

Hospitals, PublicFemaleHumansMaleNew South WalesPrevalenceQuality of Health Carehealthcare quality improvementhealth policyhealth services research

Identifiers

PMID30082331
PMCPMC6559783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.