Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30081949›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2018

CLOUD: a non-parametric detection test for microbiome outliers.

Emmanuel Montassier, Gabriel A Al-Ghalith, Benjamin Hillmann, Kimberly Viskocil, Amanda J Kabage, Christopher E McKinlay, Michael J Sadowsky, Alexander Khoruts, Dan Knights

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmanuel MontassierMiHAR lab, Université de Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France. emmanuel.montassier@univ-nantes.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2313-1172
Gabriel A Al-GhalithDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Benjamin HillmannDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Kimberly ViskocilDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition in the Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Amanda J KabageDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition in the Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Christopher E McKinlayDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Michael J SadowskyBiotechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Alexander KhorutsDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition in the Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Dan KnightsDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. dknights@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDysbiosis of the human gut microbiome is defined as a maladaptive or clinically relevant deviation of the community profile from the healthy or normal state. Dysbiosis has been implicated in an extensive set of metabolic, auto-immune, and infectious diseases, and yet there is substantial inter-individual variation in microbiome composition even within body sites of healthy humans. An individual's microbiome varies over time in a high-dimensional space to form their personal microbiome cloud. This cloud may or may not be similar to that of other people, both in terms of the average microbiome profile (conformity) and the diameter of the cloud (stability). However, there is currently no robust non-parametric test that determines whether a patient's microbiome cloud is an outlier with respect to a reference group of healthy individuals with widely varying microbiome profiles.

methodsHere, we propose a test for outliers' detection in the human gut microbiome that accounts for the wide range of microbiome phenotypes observed in a typical set of healthy individuals and for intra-individual temporal variation. Our robust nonparametric outlier detection test, the CLOUD test, performs two assessments of a patient's microbiome health: conformity, the extent to which the patient's microbiome cloud is ecologically similar to a subset of healthy subjects; and stability, which compares the cloud diameter of a patient to those of healthy subjects. The CLOUD test is based on locally linear embedded ecological distances, allowing it to account for widely varying microbiome compositions among reference individuals. It also leverages temporal variability within patients and reference individuals to increase the robustness of the test.

resultsWe describe the CLOUD test, and we apply it to one novel and two previously published cohorts of patients receiving fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile colitis, as well as to two known healthy cohorts, demonstrating high concordance of the CLOUD conformity and stability indices with clinical outcomes.

conclusionsAlthough the CLOUD test is not, on its own, a test for clinical dysbiosis, it nonetheless provides a framework for outlier testing that could be incorporated into evaluation of suspected dysbiosis, which may play a role in diagnosis and prognosis of numerous pediatric and adult diseases.

Indexed as

BacteriaClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsComputational BiologyDysbiosisEnterocolitisFecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansConformityDysbiosisFecal microbiota transplantationMicrobiomeOutlierStability

Identifiers

PMID30081949
PMCPMC6080375
OpenAlexW2886394267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.