ArticleImplementation science : IS2018
Longitudinal evaluation of a course to build core competencies in implementation practice.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Training and education provided to local change champions within implementation trials: a rapid systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2025Pooled it
- Building capacity in dissemination and implementation science: a systematic review of the academic literature on teaching and training initiatives.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Implementation and evaluation of a technical support center for the Research to Enhance the Adaptation and Implementation of Health Systems Guidelines in LMICs [RAISE] initiative.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Bridging research and practice for dementia care: strategies and challenges of public and private funders in the dissemination and implementation of dementia research.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Identifying capacity building priorities for implementation science in suicide prevention: a concept mapping study in Australia.Translational behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Mapping the landscape of implementation science training: gaps and opportunities to strengthen capacity for implementation research and practice.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Harnessing Implementation Science to Reform Juvenile Services: A Roadmap for Change.Journal of applied juvenile justice services · 2026Article
- Intensive capacity building in implementation science: an evaluation of the University of Washington Implementation Science Summer Institute.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Advancing Global Cancer Symptom Science: Insights and Strategies From the Inaugural Cancer Symptom Science Expert Meeting.Oncology nursing forum · 2025Article
- Advancing Global Cancer Symptom Science: Insights and Strategies from the Inaugural Cancer Symptom Science Expert Meeting.Seminars in oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Building capacity and equity in implementation science: evaluation of a national mentored training program.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- A mapping review and critique of the literature on translation, dissemination, and implementation capacity building initiatives for different audiences.Implementation science communications · 2025Review
- Article
- Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Impact of Allied Health - Translating Research into Practice (AH-TRIP) Program on the Knowledge Translation Capacity of the Allied Health Workforce.International journal of health policy and management · 2025Article
- Development and evaluation of an intensive short course: the Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Interdisciplinary Instructional Institute (QMRA III).Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2024Article
- Development and psychometric evaluation of the Implementation Support Competencies Assessment.Implementation science : IS · 2024Article
- Article
- Models and approaches for building knowledge translation capacity and capability in health services: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2024Article
- Essential content for teaching implementation practice in healthcare: a mixed-methods study of teams offering capacity-building initiatives.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Developing a knowledge translation program for health practitioners: Allied Health Translating Research into Practice.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFew training opportunities are available for implementation practitioners; we designed the Practicing Knowledge Translation (PKT) to address this gap. The goal of PKT is to train practitioners to use evidence and apply implementation science in healthcare settings. The aim of this study was to describe PKT and evaluate participant use of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs), knowledge, self-efficacy, and satisfaction and feedback on the course.
methodsPKT was delivered to implementation practitioners between September 2015 and February 2016 through a 3-day workshop, 11 webinars. We assessed PKT using an uncontrolled before and after study design, using convergent parallel mixed methods. The primary outcome was use of TMFs in implementation projects. Secondary outcomes were knowledge and self-efficacy across six core competencies, factors related to each of the outcomes, and satisfaction with the course. Participants completed online surveys and semi-structured interviews at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.
resultsParticipants (n = 15) reported an increase in their use of implementation TMFs (mean = 2.11; estimate = 2.11; standard error (SE) = 0.4; p = 0.03). There was a significant increase in participants' knowledge of developing an evidence-informed, theory-driven program (ETP) (estimate = 4.10; SE = 0.37; p = 0.002); evidence implementation (estimate = 2.68; SE = 0.42; p < 0.001); evaluation (estimate = 4.43; SE = 0.36; p < 0.001); sustainability, scale, and spread (estimate = 2.55; SE = 0.34; p < 0.001); and context assessment (estimate = 3.86; SE = 0.32; p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in participants' self-efficacy in developing an ETP (estimate = 3.81; SE = 0.34; p < 0.001); implementation (estimate = 3.01; SE = 0.36; p < 0.001); evaluation (estimate = 3.83; SE = 0.39; p = 0.002); sustainability, scale, and spread (estimate = 3.06; SE = 0.46; p = 0.003); and context assessment (estimate = 4.05; SE = 0.38; p = 0.016).
conclusionProcess and outcome measures collected indicated that PKT participants increased use of, knowledge of, self-efficacy in KT. Our findings highlight the importance of longitudinal evaluations of training initiatives to inform how to build capacity for implementers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.