Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30081918›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2018

Are our 'UHC systems' learning systems? Piloting an assessment tool and process in six African countries.

E Akhnif, J A Kiendrebeogo, A Idrissi Azouzzi, Z Adam, C P Makoutode, S Mayaka Manitu, Z Njoumemi, A Gamble Kelley, B Meessen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Best Practices in Achieving Universal Health Coverage: A Scoping Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

E AkhnifMinistry of Health, Rabat, Morocco. akhnif@yahoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2622-2704
J A KiendrebeogoUniversity Ouaga 1 Professor Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
A Idrissi AzouzziMinistry of Health, Rabat, Morocco.
Z AdamMinistry of Health, Rabat, Morocco.
C P MakoutodeRegional Public Health Institute Comlan Alfred Quenum, Cotonou, Benin.
S Mayaka ManituSchool of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Z NjoumemiHealth Economics Research and Evaluation for Development Results Group, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
A Gamble KelleyResults for Development, Washington, DC, USA.
B MeessenInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIf there is one universal recommendation to countries wanting to make progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC), it is to develop the learning capacities that will enable them to 'find their own way' - this is especially true for countries struggling with fragmented health financing systems. This paper explores results from a multi-country study whose main aim was to assess the extent to which UHC systems and processes at country level operate as 'learning systems'.

methodThis study is part of a multi-year action-research project implemented by two communities of practice active in Africa. For this specific investigation, we adapted the concept of the learning organisation to so-called 'UHC systems'. Our framework organises the assessment around 92 questions divided into blocks, sub-blocks and levels of learning, with a seven scale score in a standardised questionnaire developed during a protocol and methodology workshop attended by all the research teams. The study was implemented in six francophone African countries by national research teams involving researchers and cadres of the ministries involved in the UHC policy. Across the six countries, the questionnaire was administrated to 239 UHC actors. Data were analysed per country, per blocks and sub-blocks, by levels of learning and per question.

resultsThe study confirms the feasibility and relevance of adapting the learning organisation framework to UHC systems. All countries scored between 4 and 5 for all the sub-blocks of the learning system. The study and the validation workshops organised in the six countries indicate that the tool is particularly powerful to assess weaknesses within a specific country. However, some remarkable patterns also emerge from the cross-country analysis. Our respondents recognise the leadership developed at governmental level for UHC, but they also report some major weaknesses in the UHC system, especially the absence of a learning agenda and the limited use of data.

conclusionCountries will not progress towards UHC without strong learning systems. Our tool has allowed us to document the situation in six countries, create some awareness at country level and initiate a participatory action-oriented process.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingDelivery of Health CareGovernment ProgramsHealth PolicyProgram EvaluationUniversal Health InsuranceAdministrative PersonnelAfricaCurriculumDeveloping CountriesEvidence-Based PracticeGovernment AgenciesHealth Care ReformHumansKnowledgeLeadershipAfricaCapacity-buildingHealth systemLearning organisationParticipatory researchUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID30081918
PMCPMC6080559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.