Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30081904›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Economic assessment of the use of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test to predict preeclampsia in Germany.

Dietmar Schlembach, Martin Hund, Annabel Schroer, Cyrill Wolf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Diminished pleiotrophin as a new clue to pre-eclampsia: Linking impaired angiogenesis to adverse outcomes.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  5. The Role of Angiogenetic Factors in Preeclampsia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Diagnosis and Management of Preeclampsia: Suggested Guidance on the Use of Biomarkers.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dietmar SchlembachVivantes Network of Health, Clinicum Neukoelln, Clinic of Obstetrics, Rudower Strasse 48, 12351, Berlin, Germany. dietmar.schlembach@vivantes.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3641-5278
Martin HundRoche Diagnostics International Ltd, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Annabel SchroerRoche Diagnostics Germany GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
Cyrill WolfRoche Diagnostics International Ltd, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PRediction of short-term Outcome in preGNant wOmen with Suspected preeclampsIa Study (PROGNOSIS) demonstrated that a soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1/placental growth factor (sFlt-1/PlGF) ratio ≤ 38 ruled out the occurrence of preeclampsia in the next week with a negative predictive value of 99.3%; a ratio > 38 indicates an increased risk of developing preeclampsia in the next 4 weeks. We performed an assessment of the economic impact of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test for short-term prediction of preeclampsia in Germany.

methodsWe adapted a cost-effectiveness model, which had been developed to estimate the incremental value of adding the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test with a cut-off ratio of 38 to standard diagnostic procedures for guiding the management of women with suspected preeclampsia in the UK. We used the adapted model to estimate the incremental value of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test (cut-off 38) for guiding the management of women with suspected preeclampsia from a German Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) payer perspective. The economic model estimated costs associated with diagnosis and management of preeclampsia in women managed in either a 'no-test' scenario in which clinical decisions are based on standard diagnostic procedures alone, or a 'test' scenario in which the sFlt-1/PlGF test is used in addition to standard diagnostic procedures. Test characteristics and rates of hospitalization were derived from patient-level data from PROGNOSIS. The main outcome measure from the economic model was the total cost per patient.

resultsIn the model adapted to the German DRG payer system, introduction of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test with a cut-off value of 38 could reduce the proportion of women hospitalized in Germany from 44.6 to 24.0%, resulting in an expected cost saving of €361 per patient.

conclusionsThe sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test is likely to reduce unnecessary hospitalization of women with a low risk of developing preeclampsia, and identify those at high risk to ensure appropriate management. Even within the restrictions of the DRG system in Germany, this results in substantial cost savings for women with suspected preeclampsia.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisBiomarkersDecision TreesDiagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and GynecologicalFemaleGermanyHealth Care CostsHumansModels, EconomicPlacenta Growth FactorPre-EclampsiaPregnancyVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1BiomarkersPlacenta Growth FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1Angiogenic factorsCost-effectivenessCost-savingDiagnosisDiagnosis-related groupEconomicGermanyHospitalizationHypertensionPreeclampsiaPregnancysFlt-1/PlGF

Identifiers

PMID30081904
PMCPMC6080558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.