ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2018
Nearest Neighbor Method to Estimate Internal Target for Real-Time Tumor Tracking.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis work proposed a nearest neighbor estimation method to track the respiration-induced tumor motion.
methodsBased on the simultaneously collected motion traces of external surrogate and internal target during the modeling phase prior to treatment, we first obtain the nearest neighbors of the current surrogate in external space. Subsequently, the concurrent targets in internal space are determined and used to estimate the current target position. The method was validated on 71 cases that were from 3 open access databases. In addition, to evaluate the method's estimation and prediction accuracy, we compared the method with other works.
resultsExcept for 2 cases, the nearest neighbor estimation achieved the root-mean-square error of <3 mm. The comparison indicated that the method had better estimation accuracy than polynomial model and good prediction performance. DISCUSSION: The 2 exceptive cases were further analyzed for failure causes. We inferred that one was because of the lack of estimating new target in our method, and the other one was because of the mistake during data collection. Accordingly, the potential solutions were suggested. Besides, the method's estimation for surrogate outliers, effects of modeling length, calibration, and extension were discussed.
conclusionThe results demonstrated nearest neighbor estimation's effectiveness. Except for this, the method imposes no restrictions on the modality of the pretreatment target images and does not assume a specific correspondence function between the surrogate and the target. With only 1 critical parameter, this nearest neighbor estimation method is easy to implement in clinical setting and thus has potential for broad applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.