ArticleBiometrics2019
Joint skeleton estimation of multiple directed acyclic graphs for heterogeneous population.
Article in Biometrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prioritizing Autism Risk Genes using Personalized Graphical Models Estimated from Single Cell RNA-seq Data.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2022Article
- MODEL FREE ESTIMATION OF GRAPHICAL MODEL USING GENE EXPRESSION DATA.The annals of applied statistics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The directed acyclic graph (DAG) is a powerful tool to model the interactions of high-dimensional variables. While estimating edge directions in a DAG often requires interventional data, one can estimate the skeleton of a DAG (i.e., an undirected graph formed by removing the direction of each edge in a DAG) using observational data. In real data analyses, the samples of the high-dimensional variables may be collected from a mixture of multiple populations. Each population has its own DAG while the DAGs across populations may have significant overlap. In this article, we propose a two-step approach to jointly estimate the DAG skeletons of multiple populations while the population origin of each sample may or may not be labeled. In particular, our method allows a probabilistic soft label for each sample, which can be easily computed and often leads to more accurate skeleton estimation than hard labels. Compared with separate estimation of skeletons for each population, our method is more accurate and robust to labeling errors. We study the estimation consistency for our method, and demonstrate its performance using simulation studies in different settings. Finally, we apply our method to analyze gene expression data from breast cancer patients of multiple cancer subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.