Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30081356›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2018

Between empowerment and self-discipline: Governing patients' conduct through technological self-care.

Dimitra Petrakaki, Eva Hilberg, Justin Waring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Electronic Health Literacy Among Baby Boomers: A Typology.Health literacy research and practice · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Seasonal Patterns and Trends in Dermatoses in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dimitra PetrakakiDepartment of Management, University of Sussex, BN1 9SL, United Kingdom. Electronic address: d.petrakaki@sussex.ac.uk.
Eva HilbergUniversity of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Justin WaringUniversity of Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent health policy renders patients increasingly responsible for managing their health via digital technology such as health apps and online patient platforms. This paper discusses underlying tensions between empowerment and self-discipline embodied in discourses of technological self-care. It presents findings from documentary analysis and interviews with key players in the English digital health context including policy makers, health designers and patient organisations. We show how discourses ascribe to patients an enterprising identity, which is inculcated with economic interests and engenders self-discipline. However, this reading does not capture all implications of technological self-care. A governmentality lens also shows that technological self-care opens up the potential for a de-centring of medical knowledge and its subsequent communalization. The paper contributes to Foucauldian healthcare scholarship by showing how technology could engender agential actions that operate at the margins of an enterprising discourse.

Indexed as

Power, PsychologicalTechnologyGovernmentHealth PolicyHumansSelf CareUnited KingdomEmpowermentGovernmentalitySelf-disciplineTechnologyUK

Identifiers

PMID30081356
PMCPMC6137078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.