ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2018
Survival from Clostridium toxic shock syndrome: Case report and review of the literature.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paeniclostridium sordelli toxic shock syndrome after a septic abortion - A case report.IDCases · 2026Article
- De novo design of potent inhibitors of clostridial family toxins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- FatalPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Leukemoid reaction with severe thrombocytopenia in a dying patient: a case report and literature review.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Review
- Toxic Shock Syndrome after Surgery: Case Presentation and Systematic Review of the Literature.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020Article
- Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClostridial toxic shock is a rare syndrome traditionally described in case studies and reviews as a uniformly fatal condition associated with post-partum and post-abortion. Clostridium sordellii was first mentioned in scientific literature as a human pathogen in 1922 when Argentinian microbiologist Alfredo Sordellii identified the organism in gangrenous wounds. Over the past century, there has been infrequent discussion and little awareness surrounding this serious condition. Information about patients who survived C. sordellii toxic shock is essentially nonexistent. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 31-year old post-partum female who underwent caesarian section 17 days prior, presented with abdominal pain and septic features. She underwent six operations/procedures over the next 17 days and was hospitalized for 25 days before discharge to her home with a successful outcome. DISCUSSION: This case provides insight on the process of identifying and managing complications associated with clostridial toxic shock syndrome. Out of now, 16 reported cases of C sordellii gynecologic infections in the world literature, our patient is the second patient to survive infection by this organism. More research is needed to provide clinicians with evidence-based approaches for managing these unique cases.
conclusionWe present a case report of a rare toxic shock syndrome in a post-partum female caused by Clostridium sordellii. Her survival is notable among 16 patients with whom this infection now has a documented 87.5% mortality rate. Aggressive surgical measures and optimized intensive care management may have contributed to this patient's survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.