Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30080997›Full record

ArticleChest2018

Characteristics and Outcomes of Small Cell Lung Cancer Detected by CT Screening.

Anish Thomas, Puskar Pattanayak, Eva Szabo, Paul Pinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2021
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anish ThomasDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address: anish.thomas@nih.gov.
Puskar PattanayakRadiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD.
Eva SzaboDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Paul PinskyDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

Funding

Exploiting DNA Replicative Stress for Novel Small Cell Lung Cancer TherapiesZIABC011793 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI THOMAS, ANISH · 2018 to 2025
$16.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies with a limited number of patients have reported divergent findings on whether screening can detect small cell lung cancer (SCLC) at an earlier stage and whether there might be a survival benefit.

methodsThis study examined the characteristics of SCLC detected by using low-dose CT (LDCT) screening in the National Lung Screening Trial, a randomized study of individuals at high risk for developing lung cancer comparing LDCT imaging vs chest radiography. SCLC was denoted as screen detected if diagnosed ≤ 1 year of a positive screen or after a longer period but with no time gap between diagnostic procedures of > 1 year; interval detected if diagnosed ≤ 1 year of a negative screen; and nonscreen detected if the subject did not receive any screens or otherwise as postscreening.

resultsA total of 143 cases of SCLC were diagnosed, including 49 (34.2%) screen detected, 15 (10.5%) interval detected, and 79 (55.2%) nonscreened/postscreening. Of the screening phase-diagnosed cases (ie, screen or interval detected), a higher proportion of SCLC cases compared with NSCLC cases were interval detected (23% vs 5%; P < .0001). A higher proportion of all SCLC cases compared with NSCLC cases were advanced stage (III/IV: 86% vs 36%; P < .0001). The unfavorable SCLC stage distribution extended across screen-detected (80% stage III/IV), interval-detected (86%), and nonscreened/postscreening (90%) cancers. Among screen-detected SCLC, only 63.3% had ≥ 1 noncalcified nodule in the cancer lobe compared with 85.4% of NSCLC cases (P < .0001). Even with very small LDCT screen-detected nodules, a high proportion of SCLC cases were late stage. There was no significant difference in survival between screen- and interval-detected or postscreening SCLC.

conclusions"Early detection" with the use of LDCT imaging had no impact on SCLC outcomes. A successful screening modality should ideally detect SCLC earlier than when it can be detected on LDCT scans.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRadiation DosageTime Factorslow-dose CT scanlung cancer screeningnon-small cell lung cancersmall cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID30080997
PMCPMC6335258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.