Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30080906›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2018

Tear biomarkers in latanoprost and bimatoprost treated eyes.

Shweta Reddy, Prity Sahay, Debananda Padhy, Sarada Sarangi, Mrutyunjay Suar, Rahul Modak, Aparna Rao

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. From Eye Care to Hair Growth: Bimatoprost.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Changes in Tear Proteomic Profile in Ocular Diseases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  5. Clinical Tear Fluid Proteomics-A Novel Tool in Glaucoma Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Discovery and clinical translation of novel glaucoma biomarkers.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Biomarkers for Glaucoma.Current ophthalmology reports · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shweta ReddyHyderabad Eye Research Foundation (HERF), L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Prity SahayHyderabad Eye Research Foundation (HERF), L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Debananda PadhyHyderabad Eye Research Foundation (HERF), L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sarada SarangiHyderabad Eye Research Foundation (HERF), L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Mrutyunjay SuarSchool of Biotechnology, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India.
Rahul ModakSchool of Biotechnology, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India.
Aparna RaoHyderabad Eye Research Foundation (HERF), L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8120-8740
L V Prasad Eye Institute · INKIIT University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProstaglandin analogues (PGA's) are the mainstay and first line of treatment in current glaucoma practise. Though latanoprost and bimatoprost are the most commonly used PGA's with minimal side effects at lower concentrations like bimaotoprost 0.01%, direct comparison of their cytokine/MMP profile in tears has not been evaluated earlier. The study intends to ascribe PGA to the upregulation of MMPs, Cytokines and Chemokines mediating varied pathways to result in side effects of the drugs.

methodsTear sample collection was done from outer canthus of 30 eyes of 30 patients (primary open angle glaucoma (n = 26 and n' = 20), normal tension glaucoma (n = 4 and n' = 10), in latanoprost (n) 0.005% and bimatoprost (n') 0.01% group respectively, with a mean age of 62±10.5 years) on >6 months of PGA use using Tear floTM Schirmer filter strip. Tear samples from 30 eyes of 30 cataract patients without drug treatment were used as the control. Gelatinolytic activity of MMP-9 and MMP-2 were examined by substrate gelatine zymography MMP-1 and TIMP-1 concentrations from tears samples with PGAs were evaluated by ELISA while cytokine concentration in the eluted tears was evaluated using a convenient bioplex kit assay (Milliplex MAP kit, HCYTMAG-60K-PX41, Millipore, Massachusetts, United States). The mean duration of use of PGA in both groups did not differ significantly (median 1.3 years in bimatoprost and 1.1 years in latanoprost eyes, p = 0.6).

resultsThe tear MMP-9 expression was higher in eyes receiving latanoprost while the MMP-2 expression was higher in eyes receiving bimatoprost with MMP1 protein levels being higher in the former. Latanoprost treated eyes had marginally elevated tear cytokines involved in tissue remodelling while bimatoprost eyes showed elevated cytokines regulating allergic pathways.

conclusionDifferential cytokine and MMP expression indicates differential signalling pathways mediating different cellular effects (evident as clinical and side effects) with the two drugs which can be explored further.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBimatoprostBiomarkersCataractCohort StudiesCytokinesFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansLatanoprostMaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 1Matrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9Middle AgedTearsAntihypertensive AgentsBimatoprostBiomarkersCytokinesLatanoprostMatrix Metalloproteinase 1Matrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9MMP1 protein, humanMMP9 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30080906
PMCPMC6078293
OpenAlexW2887984124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.