Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30080878›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Impact of combining the progesterone receptor and preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) as a prognostic factor after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy using aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal ER positive and HER2 negative breast cancer.

Sasagu Kurozumi, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Kenichi Inoue, Katsunori Tozuka, Yuji Hayashi, Masafumi Kurosumi, Tetsunari Oyama, Takaaki Fujii, Jun Horiguchi, Hiroyuki Kuwano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sasagu KurozumiDivision of Breast Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9971-2918
Hiroshi MatsumotoDivision of Breast Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Kenichi InoueDivision of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Katsunori TozukaDivision of Breast Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Yuji HayashiDivision of Breast Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Masafumi KurosumiDepartment of Pathology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Tetsunari OyamaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Takaaki FujiiDepartment of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Jun HoriguchiDepartment of Breast Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroyuki KuwanoDepartment of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Saitama Cancer Center · JPGunma University · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) predicts survival after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAE) using aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for women with postmenopausal estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer irrespective of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. Although the progesterone receptor (PgR) is also a prognostic factor for ER-positive breast cancer, the PgR status was not considered a prognostic factor in the original PEPI scoring system. In this study, we investigated the utility of a modified PEPI including the PgR status (PEPI-P) as a prognostic factor after NAE for postmenopausal patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. We enrolled 107 patients with invasive ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer treated with exemestane for ≥4 months as NAE. We initially assessed PEPI and compared survival between the groups. Additionally, we obtained an effective cutoff for PgR through survival analysis. Then, we assessed the survival significance of PEPI-P. A PgR staining rate of 50% was the most significant cutoff for predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). PEPI was a significant prognostic factor; moreover, PEPI-P was the most significant prognostic indicator for RFS and CSS. PEPI-P is a potent prognostic indicator of survival after NAE using AIs for postmenopausal patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. This modified PEPI may be useful for therapeutic decision-making regarding postmenopausal ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer after NAE.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm GradingPostmenopausePreoperative PeriodPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID30080878
PMCPMC6078304
OpenAlexW2887970871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.