ArticlePloS one2018
On the overestimation of random forest's out-of-bag error.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Responsiveness to Highly Challenging Balance and Gait Training in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Trial
- Deep learning based prediction of prognosis in nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Article
- Identifying pre-treatment risk factors for cancer-related cognitive decline in patients with breast cancer.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Mapping global resource driven nature loss in the mining sector from 2001 to 2022.Nature communications · 2026Article
- An evolutionary weighted feature influence factor feature selection method for fault detection in the Tennessee Eastman complex chemical process.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of tuberculosis mortality: a comparative analysis of random survival forest and cox regression models.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Individual EV Classification Based on Highly Sensitive Multiplexed Mass Spectrometry Measurements.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Article
- Feature Selection and Hyperparameter Optimization for Machine Learned Classification of 3D Single-Particle Tracking.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of 30-day unplanned readmission risk in day surgery lung cancer patients after lobectomy or sublobectomy: a real-world study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- High-Accuracy Chicken Breed Identification Using Microsatellite Genotype Data and AutoGluon Framework.Biology · 2025Article
- In-Situ Monitoring of Directed Energy Deposition Laser Beam of Nickel-Based Superalloy via Built-in Optical Coaxial Camera.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quantitative cytoarchitectural phenotyping of deparaffinized human brain tissues.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Assessing Random Forest self-reproducibility for optimal short biomarker signature discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- An In-depth overview of artificial intelligence (AI) tool utilization across diverse phases of organ transplantation.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Ranking Nursing Diagnoses by Predictive Relevance for Intensive Care Unit Transfer Risk in Adult and Pediatric Patients: A Machine Learning Approach with Random Forest.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Lithological Mapping in High-Vegetation Areas Using Sentinel-2, Sentinel-1, and Digital Elevation Models.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigating the role of environmental factors in the French highly pathogenic avian influenza epizootic in 2022-2023.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ensemble method random forests has become a popular classification tool in bioinformatics and related fields. The out-of-bag error is an error estimation technique often used to evaluate the accuracy of a random forest and to select appropriate values for tuning parameters, such as the number of candidate predictors that are randomly drawn for a split, referred to as mtry. However, for binary classification problems with metric predictors it has been shown that the out-of-bag error can overestimate the true prediction error depending on the choices of random forests parameters. Based on simulated and real data this paper aims to identify settings for which this overestimation is likely. It is, moreover, questionable whether the out-of-bag error can be used in classification tasks for selecting tuning parameters like mtry, because the overestimation is seen to depend on the parameter mtry. The simulation-based and real-data based studies with metric predictor variables performed in this paper show that the overestimation is largest in balanced settings and in settings with few observations, a large number of predictor variables, small correlations between predictors and weak effects. There was hardly any impact of the overestimation on tuning parameter selection. However, although the prediction performance of random forests was not substantially affected when using the out-of-bag error for tuning parameter selection in the present studies, one cannot be sure that this applies to all future data. For settings with metric predictor variables it is therefore strongly recommended to use stratified subsampling with sampling fractions that are proportional to the class sizes for both tuning parameter selection and error estimation in random forests. This yielded less biased estimates of the true prediction error. In unbalanced settings, in which there is a strong interest in predicting observations from the smaller classes well, sampling the same number of observations from each class is a promising alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.