Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30080743›Full record

Trial reportShock (Augusta, Ga.)2019

Inverse Correlation Between Plasma Sphingosine-1-Phosphate and Ceramide Concentrations in Septic Patients and Their Utility in Predicting Mortality.

Xiaoliang Wu, Jinchao Hou, Hui Li, Guohao Xie, Xiaolin Zhang, Jungang Zheng, Jiang Wang, Feng Gao, Yongming Yao, Hong Liu and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoliang WuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jinchao HouDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Guohao XieDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaolin ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Jungang ZhengDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, The First Hospital of Ningbo, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Jiang WangState Key Laboratory of Drug Research and Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Feng GaoState Key Laboratory of Drug Research and Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yongming YaoTrauma Research Center, First Hospital Affiliated to the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hong LiuState Key Laboratory of Drug Research and Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xiangming FangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang University · CNShanghai Institute of Materia Medica · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNHangzhou Red Cross Hospital · CNNingbo First Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between plasma sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and ceramide concentrations in sepsis, and the possible mechanisms for altered expression.

methodsPlasma S1P and ceramide concentrations were measured by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS. HLA-DR (human leukocyte antigen-DR) expression on peripheral blood mononuclear cells was examined by flow cytometry. Platelet sphingosine kinases 1/2 (SphK1/2) mRNA expression, protein content, and enzyme activities were determined by qRT-PCR, western blot, and commercial enzyme assay kits, respectively.

resultsCompared with healthy and ICU controls, septic patients had significantly decreased plasma S1P but increased ceramide concentrations (P < 0.05). S1P concentration was negatively associated with the ceramide concentration in the septic patients (r = -0.36, P < 0.05). Linear regression analysis found that plasma S1P and ceramide were linked not only to sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (SOFA) score but also the HLA-DR expression on circulating monocytes. An receiver operating characteristic analysis, including S1P, ceramide, SOFA score and HLA-DR, showed integrated analysis of S1P and ceramide as the better powerful predictors of septic lethality with area under the curve value of 0.95. More importantly, we found the platelet SphKs activities and the expression levels of SphK1 were significantly decreased in septic patients (P < 0.05). Linear regression analysis revealed platelet SphKs activity was positively associated with the plasma S1P concentration of the septic patients (r = -0.41, P = 0.02).

conclusionsIntegrated analysis of plasma S1P and ceramide predict septic mortality with high accuracy. The decreased platelet SphK1 expression and subsequent reduced SphKs activity might be responsible for the decreased plasma S1P levels during sepsis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCeramidesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLysophospholipidsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSepsisSphingosineSurvival RateCeramidesLysophospholipidsSphingosinesphingosine 1-phosphate

Identifiers

PMID30080743
PMCPMC6511430
OpenAlexW2886234386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.