Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30079856›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2018

Process evaluation of a national, community-based, food supplementary programme for improving the nutritional status of children in Iran.

Delaram Ghodsi, Arash Rashidian, Nasrin Omidvar, Hassan Eini-Zinab, Hossein Raghfar, Marziyeh Ebrahimi

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Delaram Ghodsi1Department of Community Nutrition,National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute,Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Islamic Republic of Iran.
Arash Rashidian2Department of Health Management and Economics,4th Floor,New Building,School of Public Health,Tehran University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Islamic Republic of Iran.
Nasrin Omidvar1Department of Community Nutrition,National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute,Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Islamic Republic of Iran.
Hassan Eini-Zinab1Department of Community Nutrition,National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute,Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Islamic Republic of Iran.
Hossein Raghfar3Department of Economics,Alzahra University,Tehran,Islamic Republic of Iran.
Marziyeh Ebrahimi4Department of Sociology,Shahid Beheshti University,Tehran,Islamic Republic of Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the process of implementation of a national nutritional programme for improving the nutritional status of children in Iran.

designA cross-sectional process evaluation was carried out using field observations, document reviews, semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions.

settingData were collected across urban and rural areas of Qazvin and Semnan provinces of Iran, March-September 2014. SUBJECTS: Mothers (n 362) of children under programme coverage were chosen for the survey. Senior nutrition officers, the head of Hygiene, Remedy and Insurance Affairs at Imam Khomeini Relief Foundation and community health workers were selected purposively for interviews. Mothers with at least one child under 6 years of age covered by the programme were selected to participate in focus group discussions.

resultsFive steps of programme implementation were identified: supplementary food basket content, food basket distribution methods, selection of eligible children, distributed food consumption, and child growth monitoring and nutrition training sessions for mothers. The distributed food baskets did not have enough milk/dairy products, vegetables and fruits. Nearly 50 % of children consumed 75-100 % of the distributed milk and cake/biscuit, while staple foods were shared with other family members. When electronic cards were offered instead of food baskets, attendance for child growth monitoring and the food items participants chose with the cards tended to differ from what was originally designed.

conclusionsFocusing on food items that are mostly being used for child feeding (e.g. eggs or milk in food baskets) may be beneficial to assure the target child is receiving the distributed foods.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceAdultChildChild, PreschoolCommunity Health WorkersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Plan ImplementationHumansInfantIranMaleNutritionistsProcess Assessment, Health CareRural PopulationChildren MalnutritionProcess evaluationSupplementary food programme

Identifiers

PMID30079856
PMCPMC10261040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.