ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2019
Advances in Porous Scaffold Design for Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering and Regeneration.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Platelet-Rich Plasma for Bone Fracture Treatment: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence in Preclinical and Clinical Studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- PCL/Chitosan/Bioglass Hybrid Composite Shape Memory Scaffolds With Accelerated Degradation and Enhanced Bioactivity.Macromolecular materials and engineering · 2026Article
- Biomaterial Strategies for Three-Dimensional Bioprinting and Drug Delivery Application.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Enhancing the osteogenic potential of 3D-printed polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds via in-situ ZIF-8 surface modification.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- Bovine Cartilage-Derived Type II Collagen Composite Scaffolds: Collagen Characterization, Physicochemical Properties, and In Vitro Chondrocyte Responses.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Nasal Chondrocytes Intensively Invade and Repair Pathologically Altered Cartilage Through Intrinsic Genomic Mechanisms: A Narrative Review.Current rheumatology reviews · 2026Review
- The 3D printed biphasic scaffolds incorporating epimedin C promotes osteochondral regeneration in osteoarthritis rats.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- 3D-Printed Region-Specific Biomimetic Prosthesis for Enhancing Heterogeneous Double-Interface Integration of Bone-Prosthesis and Tendon-Prosthesis.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
- From Therapeutic Dilemma to Precision Modulation: Harnessing Biomaterials to Target the Dual Face of TGF-β in Osteoarthritis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Bone Regeneration in Rat Calvaria Using 3D-Printed Scaffolds with Graded Porosity and In Vitro Degradation.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in 3D Bioprinting of Porous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: A Narrative and Critical Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Bioactive, PDMS-containing shape memory composite scaffolds with accelerated degradation rates.Polymer · 2025Article
- Decellularized cartilage scaffolds derived from wharton's jelly facilitate cartilage regeneration and inhibit angiogenesis.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Direct Scaffold-Coupled Electrical Stimulation of Chondrogenic Progenitor Cells through Graphene Foam Bioscaffolds to Control the Mechanical Properties of Graphene Foam-Cell Composites.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional-Printed Bone Grafts for Simultaneous Bone and Cartilage Regeneration: A Promising Approach to Osteochondral Tissue Engineering.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Bone Regeneration: A Review of Current Treatment Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Overview of porous magnesium-based scaffolds: development, properties and biomedical applications.Materials futures · 2025Review
- PoreVision: A Program for Enhancing Efficiency and Accuracy in SEM Pore Analyses of Gels and Other Porous Materials.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Advances in Clinical Implications of 3D Printing for Osteochondral Regeneration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
impact statementChallenges in musculoskeletal tissue regeneration affect millions of patients globally. Scaffolds for tissue engineering bone and cartilage provide promising solutions that increase healing and decrease need for complicated surgical procedures. Porous scaffolds have emerged as an attractive alternative to traditional scaffolds. However, the success of advanced materials, use of biological factors, and manufacturing techniques can vary depending on use case. This review provides perspective on porous scaffold manufacturing, characterization and application, and can be used to inform future scaffold design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.