ArticleBJS open2018
Experimental study of diclofenac and its biliary metabolites on anastomotic healing.
Article in BJS open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiclofenac increases the risk of anastomotic leakage, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. As diclofenac is excreted largely as biliary metabolites, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of these metabolites on intestinal anastomoses.
methodsThis was a randomized controlled blinded experiment using 210 male Wistar rats to assess the effect of 'diclofenac bile' on the anastomotic complication score, leak rate and anastomotic strength following oral and parenteral administration of diclofenac. Bile duct and duodenal catheterization techniques were used for diversion and replacement of bile, and biliary diclofenac metabolites were determined.
resultsReplacement of control bile with diclofenac bile resulted in higher anastomotic complication scores (P = 0·006) and leakage in five of 18 animals, compared with one of 18 controls (P = 0·089). In turn, following oral diclofenac administration, replacement of diclofenac bile with control bile reduced anastomotic complications (P = 0·016). The leak rate was seven of 15 versus 13 of 17 without replacement (P = 0·127). After intramuscular administration of diclofenac, the reduction in anastomotic complications was not significant when bile was replaced with control bile (P = 0·283), but it was significant when bile was drained without replacement (P = 0·025). Diclofenac metabolites in bile peaked within 2 h after administration. Administration of diclofenac bile resulted in nearly undetectable plasma levels of diclofenac (mean(s.d.) 0·01(0·01) μg/ml) after 120 min. Following oral diclofenac, bile replacement with control bile did not affect the plasma concentration of diclofenac (0·12(0·08) μg/ml versus 0·10(0·05) μg/ml with diclofenac bile; P = 0·869).
conclusionAltered bile composition as a result of diclofenac administration increases the ileal anastomotic complication rate in rats.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.