Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30079388›Full record

ArticleBJS open2018

Randomized clinical trial of high versus low inferior mesenteric artery ligation during anterior resection for rectal cancer.

S Fujii, A Ishibe, M Ota, K Watanabe, J Watanabe, C Kunisaki, I Endo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01861678 (Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate High Tie Versus Low Tie of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Rectal Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01861678 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate High Tie Versus Low Tie of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Rectal Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorShoichi Fujii, MD, PhDRan2006 to 2017Enrolled331ConditionsRectal Cancer, Colon Rectal ResectionArmsHigh tie of IMA, Low tie of IMA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Low Ligation Plus High DissectionFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S FujiiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ichikawa Hospital International University of Health and Welfare Chiba Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2295-0985
A IshibeDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Centre Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
M OtaDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Centre Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
K WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
J WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
C KunisakiDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Centre Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
I EndoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
Yokohama City University · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal level for inferior mesenteric artery ligation during anterior resection for rectal cancer is controversial. The aim of this randomized trial was to clarify whether the inferior mesenteric artery should be tied at the origin (high tie) or distal to the left colic artery (low tie).

methodsPatients were allocated randomly to undergo either high- or low-tie ligation and were stratified by surgical approach (open or laparoscopic). The primary outcome was the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Secondary outcomes were duration of surgery, blood loss and 5-year overall survival.

resultsSome 331 patients entered the trial between June 2006 and September 2012. The trial was stopped prematurely as recruitment was slow. Seven patients were excluded after randomization but before operation because of procedural changes. High tie and low tie were performed in 164 and 160 patients respectively. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was not significantly different (17·7 versus 16·3 per cent respectively; P = 0·731). The incidence of severe complications requiring intervention was 2·4 versus 5·0 per cent for high and low tie respectively (P = 0·222). In multivariable analysis, risk factors for anastomotic leakage included male sex (odds ratio 4·36, 95 per cent c.i. 1·56 to 12·18) and distance of the tumour from the anal verge (odds ratio 0·99, 0·98 to 1·00). At 5 years there were no significant differences in overall (87·2 versus 89·4 per cent respectively; P = 0·386) and disease-free (76·3 versus 77·6 per cent; P = 0·765) survival.

conclusionThe level of ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery does not significantly influence the rate of anastomotic leakage. Registration number: NCT01861678 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov).

Identifiers

PMID30079388
PMCPMC6069351
OpenAlexW2806233863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.