ArticleBJS open2018
Randomized clinical trial of high versus low inferior mesenteric artery ligation during anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Article in BJS open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01861678 (Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate High Tie Versus Low Tie of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Rectal Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate High Tie Versus Low Tie of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Rectal Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer Patients
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Low Versus High Ligation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Rectal and Sigmoid Cancers: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Inferior mesenteric artery ligation level in rectal cancer surgery: still no answer-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- High Versus Low Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Pooled it
- Low Ligation Plus High DissectionFrontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of mesenteric artery ligation level on patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Trial
- Technical considerations depending on the level of vascular ligation in laparoscopic rectal resection.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Trial
- Article
- Bridging pharmacovigilance and genetic insight: investigating drugs and indications for breast cancer risk in women with autoimmune diseases.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Left colic artery-preserving radical rectal cancer surgery: a literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Long-term clinical outcomes after high and low ligations with lymph node dissection around the root of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients with rectal cancer.Annals of coloproctology · 2024Article
- Efficacy of left colic artery preservation with D3 lymph node dissection in laparoscopic surgery for advanced sigmoid and rectal cancer.Surgery today · 2023Article
- Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of three different types of inferior mesenteric artery ligation in left colonic and rectal cancers: a network meta-analysis.Updates in surgery · 2023Review
- How to prevent postoperative ileus in colorectal surgery? a systematic review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Review
- Review
- Risk Factors and Predictive Biomarkers for Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Cancer Surgery with the Double Stapling Technique.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2023Article
- Article
- High and low inferior mesenteric artery ligation in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resections: A retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Clinical Impact of Inferior Mesenteric Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Cancer of the Sigmoid Colon or Rectum.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal level for inferior mesenteric artery ligation during anterior resection for rectal cancer is controversial. The aim of this randomized trial was to clarify whether the inferior mesenteric artery should be tied at the origin (high tie) or distal to the left colic artery (low tie).
methodsPatients were allocated randomly to undergo either high- or low-tie ligation and were stratified by surgical approach (open or laparoscopic). The primary outcome was the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Secondary outcomes were duration of surgery, blood loss and 5-year overall survival.
resultsSome 331 patients entered the trial between June 2006 and September 2012. The trial was stopped prematurely as recruitment was slow. Seven patients were excluded after randomization but before operation because of procedural changes. High tie and low tie were performed in 164 and 160 patients respectively. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was not significantly different (17·7 versus 16·3 per cent respectively; P = 0·731). The incidence of severe complications requiring intervention was 2·4 versus 5·0 per cent for high and low tie respectively (P = 0·222). In multivariable analysis, risk factors for anastomotic leakage included male sex (odds ratio 4·36, 95 per cent c.i. 1·56 to 12·18) and distance of the tumour from the anal verge (odds ratio 0·99, 0·98 to 1·00). At 5 years there were no significant differences in overall (87·2 versus 89·4 per cent respectively; P = 0·386) and disease-free (76·3 versus 77·6 per cent; P = 0·765) survival.
conclusionThe level of ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery does not significantly influence the rate of anastomotic leakage. Registration number: NCT01861678 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.