Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30079330›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2018

Patient Views on Advance Care Planning in Cirrhosis: A Qualitative Analysis.

Michelle Carbonneau, Tracy Davyduke, Jude Spiers, Amanda Brisebois, Kathleen Ismond, Puneeta Tandon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advance Directives in Portugal: A Qualitative Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Part of the solution: A survey of community organisation perspectives on barriers and facilitating actions to Advance Care Planning in British Columbia, Canada.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle CarbonneauAlberta Health Services, 8440 112 Street, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2B7.ORCID 0000-0002-2846-3619
Tracy DavydukeAlberta Health Services, 8440 112 Street, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2B7.
Jude SpiersUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing, 3-141 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy (ECHA) 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1C9.
Amanda BriseboisUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine, 2J2.00 Walter C Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, 8440 112 St., Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2R7.
Kathleen IsmondUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine, 2J2.00 Walter C Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, 8440 112 St., Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2R7.ORCID 0000-0002-9698-5814
Puneeta TandonCirrhosis Care Clinic, 8540 112 Street, Zeidler Ledcor Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2X8.
University of Alberta · CAAlberta Health Services · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To investigate patient experiences and perceptions of advance care planning (ACP) process in cirrhosis. Methods: Purposive sampling was used to identify and recruit participants (N = 17) from discrete patient groups: compensated with no prior decompensation, decompensated and not yet listed for transplant, transplant wait listed, medical contraindications for transplant, and low socioeconomic status. Review and discussion of local ACP videos, documents, and experiences with ACP occurred in two individual interviews and four focus groups. Data were analyzed using inductive content analysis including iterative processes of open coding, categorization, and abstraction. Results: Three overarching categories emerged: (1) lack of understanding about disease trajectories and ACP processes, (2) roles of alternate decision makers, and (3) preferences for receiving ACP information. Most patients desired advanced care-planning conversations before the onset of decompensation (specifically hepatic encephalopathy) with a care provider with whom they had a trusting, preexisting relationship. Involvement of the alternate decision makers was of critical importance to participants, as was the use of direct, easy to understand patient education tools that address practical issues. Conclusion: Our findings support the need for early advance care planning in the outpatient setting. Outpatient clinicians may play a key role in facilitating these discussions.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAmbulatory CareDecision MakingDisease ProgressionFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPatient Preference

Identifiers

PMID30079330
PMCPMC6069582
OpenAlexW2884951173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.