Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30079309›Full record

ArticleAsia Pacific allergy2018

A novel Australian tick

Mackenzie Kwak, Colin Somerville, Sheryl van Nunen

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Asia Pacific allergy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Occurrence and Identification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Diagnostic testing for galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose, United States, 2010 to 2018.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Red meat allergy in children and adults.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mackenzie KwakDepartment of Biological Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117558.
Colin SomervilleAllergy West, Perth, WA 6149, Australia.
Sheryl van NunenTick-induced Allergies Research and Awareness Centre, Chatswood, NSW 2067, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8192-7008
Department of the Premier and Cabinet · AUNational University of Singapore · SGThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-induced mammalian meat allergy has become an emergent allergy world-wide after van Nunen et al. first described the association between tick bites and the development of mammalian meat allergy in 2007. Cases of mammalian meat allergy have now been reported on all 6 continents where humans are bitten by ticks, in 17 countries - Australia, United States of America (USA), Europe (France, Spain, Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, Sweden, United Kingdom, Italy, and Norway), Asia (Korea and Japan), Central America (Panama), South America (Brazil), and Africa (South Africa and Ivory Coast). To date, in each of these countries, bites from only a single tick species have been linked to the development of mammalian meat allergy:

Indexed as

Alpha galAnaphylaxisGalactose-alpha 1,3-galactoseMammalian meat allergyTicks

Identifiers

PMID30079309
PMCPMC6073180
OpenAlexW2883298969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.