ArticleF1000Research2018
Who and why do researchers opt to publish in post-publication peer review platforms? - findings from a review and survey of F1000 Research.
Article in F1000Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- International initiatives to enhance awareness and uptake of open research in psychology: a systematic mapping review.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- Perspectives on systematic review protocol registration: a survey amongst stakeholders in the clinical research publication process.Systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Research impact in randomized controlled trials of diabetes: an altmetric approach.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2023Article
- The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review.PloS one · 2023Article
- Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting.BMJ open · 2020Review
- Guidelines for open peer review implementation.Research integrity and peer review · 2019Article
- Who and why do researchers opt to publish in post-publication peer review platforms? - findings from a review and survey of F1000 Research.F1000Research · 2018Article
- How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?Pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.