Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30079153›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of radiology2018

Evaluation of pineal cysts with magnetic resonance imaging.

Erkan Gokce, Murat Beyhan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic review of pineal cysts surgery in pediatric patients.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Pineal Cysts: Clinical Insights and Management Strategies.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pineal cysts in children: a paediatric series treated over the last twenty years in Lyon.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Neuroimaging of paediatric pineal, sellar and suprasellar tumours: a guide to differential diagnosis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Management of pineal and colloid cysts.Practical neurology · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pineal Cyst Apoplexy: A Rare Complication of Common Entity.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Erkan GokceDepartment of Radiology, Gaziosmanpaşa University, School of Medicine, Tokat 60100, Turkey. erkangokce@mynet.com.
Murat BeyhanDepartment of Radiology, Tokat State Hospital, Tokat 60100, Turkey.
State Hospital · GBTokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate radiological imaging findings of patients who had been found to have pineal cyst (PC) in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

methodsA total of 9546 patients who had brain MRI examination in March 2010-January 2018 period were studied. Fifty-six patients (44 female and 12 male) found to have PC were evaluated. Eighteen of the patients had had follow-up examinations of 2-94 mo (mean 30.50 ± 28.83). PC dimensions and volume, radiological imaging features (signal intensities, contours, internal septation-loculation and contrast-enhancement features) and natural history in cases who had been followed-up were evaluated by two radiologists.

resultsOf 9546 patients, 5555 were female (58.2%) and 3991 male (41.8%). Age range was 1-99 (mean 43.18 ± 20.94). PC frequency was calculated to be 0.58%. Forty-four of the 56 patients (78.57%) with PC were female and 12 male (21.43%), and their age range was 5-61 (mean 31.26 ± 12.73). Thirty-five of the PCs were typical (62.50%) and 21 (37.50%) were atypical. No significant difference was found between initial and final imaging sizes of PCs which were monitored by follow-up examinations (

conclusionPCs are cysts which do not show clear size and natural changes and are more frequently observed in females and in adult ages. Most of them are isointense with cerebrospinal fluid on T1 and T2A weighted images, hyperintense compared to cerebrospinal fluid on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; sequence and smoothly contoured. Their typical forms have peripheral rim and multilocular ones may have septal contrast-enhancement.

Indexed as

Magnetic resonance imagingPineal cystPineal region

Identifiers

PMID30079153
PMCPMC6068724
OpenAlexW2886902027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.