Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30079141›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2018

Novel biomarkers for patient stratification in colorectal cancer: A review of definitions, emerging concepts, and data.

Manish Chand, Deborah S Keller, Reza Mirnezami, Marc Bullock, Aneel Bhangu, Brendan Moran, Paris P Tekkis, Gina Brown, Alexander Mirnezami, Mariana Berho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Clinical implications of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancers which potentially spread to peritoneum.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. GUCY2C as a biomarker to target precision therapies for patients with colorectal cancer.Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Biomarkers for Stratification in Colorectal Cancer: MicroRNAs.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Manish ChandGENIE Centre, University College London, London W1W 7TS, United Kingdom. m.chand@ucl.ac.uk.
Deborah S KellerDepartment of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Centre, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Reza MirnezamiDepartment of Surgery, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Marc BullockDepartment of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
Aneel BhanguDepartment of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QU, United Kingdom.
Brendan MoranDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke RG24 7AL, United Kingdom.
Paris P TekkisDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital and Imperial College London, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom.
Gina BrownDepartment of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital and Imperial College London, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom.
Alexander MirnezamiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Southampton and NIHR, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
Mariana BerhoDepartment of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 33331, United States.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 26094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment has become more personalised, incorporating a combination of the individual patient risk assessment, gene testing, and chemotherapy with surgery for optimal care. The improvement of staging with high-resolution imaging has allowed more selective treatments, optimising survival outcomes. The next step is to identify biomarkers that can inform clinicians of expected prognosis and offer the most beneficial treatment, while reducing unnecessary morbidity for the patient. The search for biomarkers in CRC has been of significant interest, with questions remaining on their impact and applicability. The study of biomarkers can be broadly divided into metabolic, molecular, microRNA, epithelial-to-mesenchymal-transition (EMT), and imaging classes. Although numerous molecules have claimed to impact prognosis and treatment, their clinical application has been limited. Furthermore, routine testing of prognostic markers with no demonstrable influence on response to treatment is a questionable practice, as it increases cost and can adversely affect expectations of treatment. In this review we focus on recent developments and emerging biomarkers with potential utility for clinical translation in CRC. We examine and critically appraise novel imaging and molecular-based approaches; evaluate the promising array of microRNAs, analyze metabolic profiles, and highlight key findings for biomarker potential in the EMT pathway.

Indexed as

BiomarkerColorectal cancerEpithelial-to-mesenchymal-transition pathwayImaging biomarkerMetabolic biomarkerMicroRNAMolecular biomarkerTumour regression grade

Identifiers

PMID30079141
PMCPMC6068858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.