Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30079130›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of stem cells2018

Stem cell therapy for faecal incontinence: Current state and future perspectives.

Jacobo Trébol, Ana Carabias-Orgaz, Mariano García-Arranz, Damián García-Olmo

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of stem cells, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Evidence outside the box: Minimally invasive treatment for anal fistula.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stromal cell derived factor 1 plasmid to regenerate the anal sphincters.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Fecal Incontinence in the Elderly.Clinics in geriatric medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Control of Motility in the Internal Anal Sphincter.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jacobo TrébolGeneral and Digestive Tract Surgery Department, Salamanca University Healthcare Centre, Salamanca 37007, Spain. jtrebol@saludcastillayleon.es.
Ana Carabias-OrgazAnaesthesiology Department, Complejo Asistencial de Ávila, Ávila 05004, Spain.
Mariano García-ArranzNew Therapies Laboratory, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid 28040, Spain.
Damián García-OlmoGeneral and Digestive Tract Surgery Department, Quiron-Salud Hospitals, Madrid 28040, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESCatholic University of Ávila · ESUniversidad Europea · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faecal continence is a complex function involving different organs and systems. Faecal incontinence is a common disorder with different pathogeneses, disabling consequences and high repercussions for quality of life. Current management modalities are not ideal, and the development of new treatments is needed. Since 2008, stem cell therapies have been validated, 36 publications have appeared (29 in preclinical models and seven in clinical settings), and six registered clinical trials are currently ongoing. Some publications have combined stem cells with bioengineering technologies. The aim of this review is to identify and summarise the existing published knowledge of stem cell utilization as a treatment for faecal incontinence. A narrative or descriptive review is presented. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that cellular therapy, mainly in the form of local injections of muscle-derived (muscle derived stem cells or myoblasts derived from them) or mesenchymal (bone-marrow- or adipose-derived) stem cells, is safe. Cellular therapy has also been shown to stimulate the repair of both acute and subacute anal sphincter injuries, and some encouraging functional results have been obtained. Stem cells combined with normal cells on bioengineered scaffolds have achieved the successful creation and implantation of intrinsically-innervated anal sphincter constructs. The clinical evidence, based on adipose-derived stem cells and myoblasts, is extremely limited yet has yielded some promising results, and appears to be safe. Further investigation in both animal models and clinical settings is necessary to drawing conclusions. Nevertheless, if the preliminary results are confirmed, stem cell therapy for faecal incontinence may well become a clinical reality in the near future.

Indexed as

Anal sphincterCell implantationCell therapyFaecal incontinenceStem cellsTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID30079130
PMCPMC6068732
OpenAlexW2884369336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.