Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30079115›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2018

mHealth and telemedicine apps: in search of a common regulation.

Chiara Crico, Chiara Renzi, Norbert Graf, Alena Buyx, Haridimos Kondylakis, Lefteris Koumakis, Gabriella Pravettoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. COVID-19 Mobile Apps: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Scoliosis Management through Apps and Software Tools.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chiara CricoDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Chiara RenziApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan 20141, Italy.
Norbert GrafDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Alena BuyxDepartment of Biomedical Ethics, Institute of Experimental Medicine, University of Kiel, Germany.
Haridimos KondylakisComputational Biomedicine Laboratory, FORTH-ICS, Heraklion, Greece.
Lefteris KoumakisComputational Biomedicine Laboratory, FORTH-ICS, Heraklion, Greece.
Gabriella PravettoniDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developments in information and communication technology have changed the way healthcare processes are experienced by both patients and healthcare professionals: more and more services are now available through computers and mobile devices. Smartphones are becoming useful tools for managing one's health, and today, there are many available apps meant to increase self-management, empowerment and quality of life. However, there are concerns about the implications of using mHealth and apps: data protection issues, concerns about sharing information online, and the patients' capacity for discerning effective and valid apps from useless ones. The new General Data Protection Regulation has been introduced in order to give uniformity to data protection regulations among European countries but shared guidelines for mHealth are yet to develop. A unified perspective across Europe would increase the control over mHealth exploitation, making it possible to think of mHealth as effective and standard tools for future medical practice.

Indexed as

data protectionEuropean communitymobile appspatient data privacytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID30079115
PMCPMC6057658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.