Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30079109›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2018

A prospective survey of comprehensive score for financial toxicity in Japanese cancer patients: report on a pilot study.

Kazunori Honda, Bishal Gyawali, Masashi Ando, Keiji Sugiyama, Seiichiro Mitani, Toshiki Masuishi, Yukiya Narita, Hiroya Taniguchi, Shigenori Kadowaki, Takashi Ura and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cancer survivor preferences on the timing and content of interventions to mitigate financial toxicity associated with cancer treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  7. Influence of age on financial toxicity in cancer patients.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Influence of financial burden on withdrawal or change of cancer treatment in Japan: results of a bereavement survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kazunori HondaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Bishal GyawaliDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Masashi AndoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Keiji SugiyamaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Seiichiro MitaniDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Toshiki MasuishiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Yukiya NaritaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Hiroya TaniguchiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Shigenori KadowakiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Takashi UraDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Kei MuroDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinancial toxicity (FT) has a negative impact on the quality of life and survival of patients with cancer. The comprehensive score for FT (COST) questionnaire is a tool to measure FT which has already been validated in patients with cancer in the United States. However, the feasibility and validity of assessing FT using the COST questionnaire have not been established in non-US healthcare settings, including that in Japan.

methodsThis is a prospective pilot survey to ascertain the feasibility of using the COST questionnaire to evaluate FT in Japanese patients with advanced solid cancer who had been receiving chemotherapy for at least 2 months. The COST questionnaire was translated into Japanese using Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy methodology.

resultsOf the 12 patients approached, 11 (92%) responded to the questionnaire. The median COST score was 22 (range, 6-29; mean ± SD, 20.18 ± 8.17). Five (45%) and two (18%) patients suffered grade 1 (COST score 14-25) and grade 2 (COST score 1-13) FT, respectively. The COST measure demonstrated good internal consistency with a Cronbach

conclusionsThe COST measure demonstrated good feasibility in measuring FT in the Japanese healthcare setting. Despite the existing universal health insurance system and ceiling amount for high-cost medical expenses, some Japanese patients experienced meaningful FT during chemotherapy. A prospective study is already underway to confirm the preliminary results (UMIN: 000025043).

Indexed as

cancercostfinancial toxicityhealth insuranceJapan

Identifiers

PMID30079109
PMCPMC6057653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.