ReviewBMC proceedings2018
Gene drives in our future: challenges of and opportunities for using a self-sustaining technology in pest and vector management.
Review in BMC proceedings, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meeting Report on an Integrated Research Agenda for Mosquito-Borne Arboviruses.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- A Comparative Assessment of Self-limiting Genetic Control Strategies for Population Suppression.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Practical Application of a Relationship-Based Model to Engagement for Gene-Drive Vector Control Programs.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024Article
- Occupational exposure to malaria, leishmaniasis and arbovirus vectors in endemic regions: A systematic review.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024Review
- Perspectives of African stakeholders on gene drives for malaria control and elimination: a multi-country survey.Malaria journal · 2023Article
- Review
- Review: Recent Applications of Gene Editing in Fish Species and Aquatic Medicine.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Mutation ofFrontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Ethical Considerations for Gene Drive: Challenges of Balancing Inclusion, Power and Perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Molecular Mechanisms and Evolutionary Consequences of Spore Killers in Ascomycetes.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2021Review
- A common gene drive language eases regulatory process and eco-evolutionary extensions.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Review
- New Frontiers in Biosafety and Biosecurity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post-market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
- Global Governing Bodies: A Pathway for Gene Drive Governance for Vector Mosquito Control.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020Review
- The need for new vector control approaches targeting outdoor biting Anopheline malaria vector communities.Parasites & vectors · 2020Review
- Bioengineering horizon scan 2020.eLife · 2020Article
- The development of complex and controversial innovations. Genetically modified mosquitoes for malaria eradication.Research policy · 2020Article
- Public health concerns over gene-drive mosquitoes: will future use of gene-drive snails for schistosomiasis control gain increased level of community acceptance?Pathogens and global health · 2020Review
- Articulating 'free, prior and informed consent' (FPIC) for engineered gene drives.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene drives are systems of biased inheritance that enhance the likelihood a sequence of DNA passes between generations through sexual reproduction and potentially throughout a local population and ultimately all connected populations of a species. Gaps in our knowledge of gene drive systems prompted the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Foundation for the NIH to ask the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) to convene an expert panel to provide an independent, objective examination of what we know about gene drive systems. The report, "Gene drives on the horizon: Advancing science, navigating uncertainty, and aligning research with public values," outlines our understanding of the science, ethics, public engagement, governance, and risk assessment pertaining to gene drive research. Researchers have studied naturally occurring gene drive systems for more than a century. While CRISPR/Cas9 was not the first molecular tool considered to create an engineered gene drive, the advent of the CRISPR/Cas9 technology for gene editing gave a renewed impetus to developing gene drives in the laboratory for eventual release in the field. Recent experiments demonstrate that a CRISPR/Cas9-based gene drive can spread a targeted gene throughout nearly all of laboratory populations of yeast, fruit flies, or mosquitoes. Applying this basic science, there are proposals to use gene drive modified organisms to address such things as eradication of insect-borne infectious diseases and conservation of threatened and endangered species. Gene drives could potentially support agriculture by reversing pesticide and herbicide resistance in insects and weeds, and by control of damaging, invasive species. A major recommendation of the NASEM report is that there is insufficient evidence at this time to support release of gene-drive modified organisms into the environment. Importantly, the committee also recognized that the potential benefits of gene drives for basic and applied research are significant and justify proceeding with laboratory research and controlled field trials. This review summarizes highlights of the NASEM report with its focus on using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing technology to develop gene drive modified organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.