Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30078647›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2018

Association of PI3K Pathway Mutations with Early Positron-Emission Tomography/CT Imaging Response after Radioembolization for Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: Results of a Single-Center Retrospective Pilot Study.

Amy R Deipolyi, Christopher C Riedl, Jacqueline Bromberg, Sarat Chandarlapaty, Christopher A Klebanoff, Constantinos T Sofocleous, Hooman Yarmohammadi, Lynn A Brody, F Edward Boas, Etay Ziv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Radioembolization of Secondary Hepatic Malignancies.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Hepatic Metastasis from Breast Cancer.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amy R DeipolyiInterventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Electronic address: deipolya@mskcc.org.
Christopher C RiedlMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Jacqueline BrombergDepartment of Radiology, Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Sarat ChandarlapatyDepartment of Radiology, Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Christopher A KlebanoffCenter for Cell Engineering and Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Constantinos T SofocleousInterventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Hooman YarmohammadiInterventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Lynn A BrodyInterventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
F Edward BoasInterventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Etay ZivInterventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Cornell University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe imaging response and survival after radioembolization for metastatic breast cancer and to delineate genetic predictors of imaging responses and outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 31 women (average age, 52 y) with liver metastasis from invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent resin and glass radioembolization (average cumulative dose, 2.0 GBq ± 1.8) between January 2011 and September 2017 after receiving ≥ 3 lines of chemotherapy. Twenty-four underwent genetic profiling with MSK-IMPACT or Sequenom; 26 had positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging before and after treatment. Survival after the first radioembolization and 2-4-month PET/CT imaging response were assessed. Laboratory and imaging features were assessed to determine variables predictive of outcomes. Unpaired Student t tests and Fisher exact tests were used to compare responders and nonresponders categorized by changes in fluorodeoxyglucose avidity. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine the impact of predictors on survival after radioembolization.

resultsMedian survival after radioembolization was 11 months (range, 1-49 mo). Most patients (18 of 26; 69%) had complete or partial response based on changes in fluorodeoxyglucose avidity. Imaging response was associated with longer survival (P = .005). Whereas 100% of patients with PI3K pathway mutations showed an imaging response, only 45% of wild-type patients showed a response (P = .01). Median survival did not differ between PI3K pathway wild-type (10.9 mo) and mutant (undefined) patients (P = .50).

conclusionsThese preliminary data suggest that genomic profiling may predict which patients with metastatic breast cancer benefit most from radioembolization. PI3K pathway mutations are associated with improved imaging response, which is associated with longer survival.

Indexed as

MutationPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultBreast NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingDNA Mutational AnalysisEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansLiver NeoplasmsMiddle AgedNew York CityPatient SelectionPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPilot ProjectsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID30078647
PMCPMC6663492
OpenAlexW2885992752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.