Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30078377›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2018

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral vascular calcifications using proton density-weighted in-phase stack of stars.

Ali Serhal, Ioannis Koktzoglou, Pascale Aouad, James C Carr, Shivraman Giri, Omar Morcos, Robert R Edelman

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Peripheral arterial disease treatment planning using noninvasive and invasive imaging methods.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Dark blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the heart, great vessels, and lungs using electrocardiographic-gated three-dimensional unbalanced steady-state free precession.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021
    Article
  6. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of descending thoracic aorta calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ali SerhalRadiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ioannis KoktzoglouRadiology, Northshore University HealthSystem, Walgreen Building, G534, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Pascale AouadRadiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
James C CarrRadiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Shivraman GiriSiemens Healthineers, Chicago, IL, USA.
Omar MorcosSurgery, Northshore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
Robert R EdelmanRadiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA. redelman999@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0013-8822
NorthShore University HealthSystem · USNorthwestern Memorial Hospital · USSiemens Healthcare (United States) · US

Funding

Nonenhanced 3T QISS MR Angiography of the Peripheral ArteriesR01HL130093 · NHLBI · ENDEAVOR HEALTH CLINICAL OPERATIONS · PI EDELMAN, ROBERT R. · 2016 to 2019
$2.0M
Projection Imaging of Peripheral Vascular CalcificationsR21HL126015 · NHLBI · ENDEAVOR HEALTH CLINICAL OPERATIONS · PI EDELMAN, ROBERT R. · 2015 to 2016
$442k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130093NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL126015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComparing cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) angiography with computed tomography angiography (CTA), a major deficiency has been its inability to reliably image peripheral vascular calcifications that may impact the choice of interventional strategy and influence patient prognosis. Recently, MRI using a proton density-weighted, in-phase stack of stars (PDIP-SOS) technique has proved capable of detecting these calcifications. The goal of the present study was two-fold: (1) to determine whether magnetic field strength impacts the apparent size and conspicuity of ilio-femoral arterial calcifications; and (2) to determine whether the technique can be accurately applied to image aorto-iliac arterial calcifications. MAIN BODY: Two patient cohorts were studied. For the first cohort, ilio-femoral arterial calcifications were imaged at 1.5 Tesla in 20 patients and at 3 Tesla in 12 patients. For the second cohort, aorto-iliac arterial calcifications were imaged in 10 patients at 3 Tesla and one patient at 1.5 Tesla. Qualitative image analysis as well as quantitative analysis using a semi-automated technique were performed using CTA as the reference standard. Qualitatively, most PDIP-SOS CMR images showed good-to-excellent confidence to detect vascular calcifications, with good-to-excellent inter-reader agreement (κ = 0.67 for ilio-femoral region, P < 0.001; κ = 0.80 for aorto-iliac region, P < 0.01). There was an overall excellent correlation (r = 0.98, P < 0.001) and agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97, P < 0.001) between PDIP-SOS CMR and CTA measures of calcification volume in both regions, with no overt difference in performance at 1.5 Tesla vs. 3 Tesla for ilio-femoral calcifications. CMR lesion volumes were slightly lower than those measured for CTA.

conclusionUsing PDIP-SOS CMR, aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral calcifications could be simultaneously evaluated at 3 Tesla in less than six minutes with excellent correlation and agreement to CTA. Our results suggest that PDIP-SOS CMR provides a reliable alternative to CT for pre-interventional evaluation of peripheral vascular calcium burden.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAortaAortic DiseasesAortographyComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleFemoral ArteryHumansIliac ArteryIllinoisImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic FieldsMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedCT angiographyMagnetic resonance imagingPeripheral arterial diseaseQuiescent-interval slice-selectiveStack of starsVascular calcification

Identifiers

PMID30078377
PMCPMC6091148
OpenAlexW2886313045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.