Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30078307›Full record

ArticleClinical endoscopy2018

Recent Advance in Colon Capsule Endoscopy: What's New?

Sung Noh Hong, Sun-Hyung Kang, Hyun Joo Jang, Michael B Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Present and Future of Colorectal Cancer Screening.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Article
  4. Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Capsule Endoscopy in Children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021
    Review
  10. What is the effective clinical use of small bowel capsule endoscopy in real life?The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sung Noh HongDepartment of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sun-Hyung KangDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Hyun Joo JangDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea.
Michael B WallaceDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a relatively new diagnostic procedure for patients with suspected colonic diseases. This convenient,noninvasive method enables the physician to explore the entire colon without significant discomfort to the patient. However, while CCEcan be performed painlessly without bowel air insufflation, the need for vigorous bowel preparation and other technical limitationsexist. Due to such limitations, CCE has not replaced conventional colonoscopy. In this review, we discuss historical and recentadvances in CCE including technical issues, ideal bowel preparation, indications and contraindications and highlight further technicaladvancements and clinical studies which are needed to develop CCE as a potential diagnostic tool.

Indexed as

Capsule endoscopyColonColonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID30078307
PMCPMC6078933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.