ArticleClinical endoscopy2018
Current Status of Interpretation of Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy.
Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Study of MiroCam MC2000 and PillCam SB3 in Detecting Small Bowel Bleeding: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Crossover Study.Gut and liver · 2025Trial
- Improved Efficiency and Lesion Detection in Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Using the Open-Source Artificial Intelligence Model SEE-AI.DEN open · 2027Article
- Preparation of image databases for artificial intelligence algorithm development in gastrointestinal endoscopy.Clinical endoscopy · 2022Review
- Video Capsule Endoscopy in Gastroenterology.Gastroenterology research · 2022Review
- A New Active Locomotion Capsule Endoscopy under Magnetic Control and Automated Reading Program.Clinical endoscopy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capsule endoscopy (CE) has revolutionized direct small bowel imaging and is widely used in clinical practice. Remote visualization ofbowel images enables painless, well-tolerated endoscopic examinations. Small bowel CE has a high diagnostic yield and the ability toexamine the entire small bowel. The diagnostic yield of CE relies on lesion detection and interpretation. In this review, issues related tolesion detection and interpretation of CE have been addressed, and the current status of automated reading software development hasbeen reviewed. Clinical significance of an external real-time image viewer has also been described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.