Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30078106›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2018

Evaluating the progressive cardiovascular health benefits of short-term high-intensity interval training.

Kathryn Holloway, Denise Roche, Peter Angell

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryn HollowaySchool of Health Sciences, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Taggart Avenue, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK. hollowk@hope.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5867-3342
Denise RocheSchool of Health Sciences, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Taggart Avenue, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK.
Peter AngellSchool of Health Sciences, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Taggart Avenue, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK.
Liverpool Hope University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHigh-intensity training is recognised as a time-efficient way of improving aerobic fitness. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the temporal nature of adaptation response and which peripheral and cardiac changes occur using the same exercise stimulus and protocol. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the progression of vascular and cardiac changes over a 6-week training period.

methodsTwelve healthy males (age 21 ± 2 years; 42.5 ± 8.3 ml min

resultsThere was a significant improvement in VO

conclusionsSix weeks of high-intensity training increases aerobic fitness and is enough to stimulate initial reductions in peripheral pressure, but not sufficient to elicit structural and functional cardiac changes, reduce arterial stiffness or lower CV risk.

Indexed as

Cardiorespiratory FitnessHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingBlood PressureHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePulse Wave AnalysisYoung AdultCardiac functionCardiovascular riskExercise trainingHigh-intensityVascular structure

Identifiers

PMID30078106
OpenAlexW2885654974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.