Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30077870›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2018

Visually validated semi-automatic high-frequency oscillation detection aides the delineation of epileptogenic regions during intra-operative electrocorticography.

Shennan Aibel Weiss, Brent Berry, Inna Chervoneva, Zachary Waldman, Jonathan Guba, Mark Bower, Michal Kucewicz, Benjamin Brinkmann, Vaclav Kremen, Fatemeh Khadjevand and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Association between Removal of High-Frequency Oscillations and the Effect of Epilepsy Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Shennan Aibel WeissDept. of Neurology and Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. Electronic address: Shennan.Weiss@jefferson.edu.
Brent BerryDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory (MSEL), USA; Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Inna ChervonevaDept. of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Zachary WaldmanDept. of Neurology and Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Jonathan GubaDept. of Neurology and Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Mark BowerDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory (MSEL), USA; Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Michal KucewiczDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory (MSEL), USA; Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Benjamin BrinkmannDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory (MSEL), USA; Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Vaclav KremenDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory (MSEL), USA; Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Fatemeh KhadjevandDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory (MSEL), USA; Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Yogatheesan VaratharajahDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory (MSEL), USA; Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Hari GuragainDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory (MSEL), USA; Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Ashwini SharanDept. of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Chengyuan WuDept. of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Richard StabaDept. of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Jerome EngelDept. of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Michael SperlingDept. of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Gregory WorrellDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory (MSEL), USA; Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Funding

In Vivo Studies of the Epileptic HippocampusRF1NS033310 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ENGEL, JEROME NONE, STABA, RICHARD · 2023 to 2023
$3.6M
Defining the Epileptogenic Network and Identifying Which Components Generate SeizuresR01NS106957 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Richard Staba · 2018 to 2026
$3.4M
Reducing or obviating the need for chronic intracranial electroencephalogram telemetry for epilepsy surgery patients by utilizing inter-ictal HFO rates: A study of diagnostic accuracyK23NS094633 · NINDS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI WEISS, SHENNAN A · 2017 to 2018
$335k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS094633NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106957NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS033310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the utility of a novel semi-automated method for detecting, validating, and quantifying high-frequency oscillations (HFOs): ripples (80-200 Hz) and fast ripples (200-600 Hz) in intra-operative electrocorticography (ECoG) recordings.

methodsSixteen adult patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) had intra-operative ECoG recordings at the time of resection. The computer-annotated ECoG recordings were visually inspected and false positive detections were removed. We retrospectively determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV) of HFO detections in unresected regions for determining post-operative seizure outcome.

resultsVisual validation revealed that 2.81% of ripple and 43.68% of fast ripple detections were false positive. Inter-reader agreement for false positive fast ripple on spike classification was good (ICC = 0.713, 95% CI: 0.632-0.779). After removing false positive detections, the PPV of a single fast ripple on spike in an unresected electrode site for post-operative non-seizure free outcome was 85.7 [50-100%]. Including false positive detections reduced the PPV to 64.2 [57.8-69.83%].

conclusionsApplying automated HFO methods to intraoperative electrocorticography recordings results in false positive fast ripple detections. True fast ripples on spikes are rare, but predict non-seizure free post-operative outcome if found in an unresected site. SIGNIFICANCE: Semi-automated HFO detection methods are required to accurately identify fast ripple events in intra-operative ECoG recordings.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrain WavesElectrocorticographyEpilepsyFemaleHumansIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringMaleMiddle AgedElectrocorticographyFast rippleHigh-frequency oscillationRipple

Identifiers

PMID30077870
PMCPMC12344896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.