ArticleThe Journal of urology2019
Clinical Usefulness of Total Length of Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.
Article in The Journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Comparison of biopsy gleason pattern 4 percentage and length in grade group 2 prostate cancer patients.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Comparison of highest and overall percentage Gleason pattern 4 in prostate cancer biopsies.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Quantification of prostate cancer Gleason pattern 4 to predict oncological outcome.BJU international · 2025Article
- Current grading of prostate cancer.Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- [Current grading of prostate cancer. German version].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Current practices in prostate pathology reporting: results from a survey of genitourinary and general pathologists.Histopathology · 2025Article
- Association of absolute amount of pattern 4 disease on prostate biopsy with oncologic outcomes in intermediate-risk prostate cancer A systematic review.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025Review
- Time to Rethink Gleason Grading.The Journal of urology · 2025Article
- The Absolute Volume of Gleason Pattern 4 on Radical Prostatectomy Is More Strongly Associated With Advanced Stage and Biochemical Recurrence Than Gleason Grade Groups.The Journal of urology · 2025Article
- Confirmatory Biopsy Outcomes in Patients with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer: Implications for Early Management.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Quantification of Gleason Pattern 4 Metrics Identifies Pathologic Progression in Patients With Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Active surveillance should not be routinely considered in ISUP grade group 2 prostate cancer.BMC urology · 2023Article
- Outcomes of Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Cancer on Initial Versus Confirmatory Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.European urology focus · 2023Review
- The highest percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 is a predictor in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.BJUI compass · 2023Article
- Blood Prostate-specific Antigen by Volume of Benign, Gleason Pattern 3 and 4 Prostate Tissue.Urology · 2022Article
- Genitourinary tumors.Journal of surgical oncology · 2022Review
- Oncologic Outcomes of Total Length Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.The Journal of urology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo our knowledge the ideal methodology of quantifying secondary Gleason pattern 4 in men with Grade Group 2/Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 on biopsy remains unknown. We compared various methods of Gleason pattern 4 quantification and evaluated associations with adverse pathology findings at radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 457 men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer on biopsy subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution. Only patients with 12 or more reviewed cores were included in analysis. We evaluated 3 methods of quantifying Gleason pattern 4, including the maximum percent of Gleason pattern 4 in any single core, the overall percent of Gleason pattern 4 (Gleason pattern 4 mm/total cancer mm) and the total length of Gleason pattern 4 in mm across all cores. Adverse pathology features at radical prostatectomy were defined as Gleason score 4 + 3 = 7 or greater (Grade Group 3 or greater), and any extraprostatic extension, seminal vesical invasion and/or lymph node metastasis. A training/test set approach and multivariable logistic regression were used to determine whether Gleason pattern 4 quantification methods could aid in predicting adverse pathology.
resultsOn multivariable analysis all Gleason pattern 4 quantification methods were significantly associated with an increased risk of adverse pathology (p <0.0001) and an increased AUC beyond the base model. The largest AUC increase was 0.044 for the total length of Gleason pattern 4 (AUC 0.728, 95% CI 0.663-0.793). Decision curve analysis demonstrated an increased clinical net benefit with the addition of Gleason pattern 4 quantification to the base model. The total length of Gleason pattern 4 clearly provided the largest net benefit.
conclusionsOur findings support the inclusion of Gleason pattern 4 quantification in the pathology reports and risk prediction models of patients with Grade Group 2/Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer. The total length of Gleason pattern 4 across all cores provided the strongest benefit to predict adverse pathology features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.