Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30076891›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Local response heterogeneity indexes experience-based neural differentiation in reading.

Jeremy J Purcell, Brenda Rapp

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01927302 (The Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01927302 nacompletednot on this map

The Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery (CNLR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2013 to 2019Enrolled90ConditionsAphasia, Dysgraphia, Anomia, AgrammatismArmsTreatment Focusing on Naming Objects, Treatment Focusing on Improving Spelling Abilities, Treatment Focusing on Improving Sentence Processing, No Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeremy J PurcellDepartment of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, USA. Electronic address: purcel14@gmail.com.
Brenda RappDepartment of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Neurobiology of Language Recovery in Aphasia: Natural History and Treatment-Ind*P50DC012283 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, CYNTHIA K · 2013 to 2017
$11.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC012283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to read requires learning letter-string representations whose neural codes would be expected to vary depending on the amount of experience that an individual has with reading them. Motivated by sparse coding theories (e.g., Rolls and Tovee, 1995; Olshausen and Field, 1996), recent work has demonstrated that better-learned relative to less well-learned neural representations are associated with more strongly differentiated, locally heterogeneous blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) responses (e.g., Jiang et al., 2013). Here we report a novel analysis method we call local heterogeneity regression (Local-Hreg) that quantifies the cross-voxel heterogeneity of BOLD responses, thereby providing a sensitive and methodologically flexible method for quantifying the local neural differentiation of neural representations. In a study of literate adults, we applied Local-Hreg to fMRI data obtained when participants read letter strings that varied in their frequency of occurrence in the written language. Consistent with previous research identifying the left ventral occipitotemporal cortex (vOTC) as a key site for orthographic representation in reading and spelling, we found that the cross-voxel heterogeneity of neural responses in this region varies according to the frequency with which the written letter strings have been experienced. This work provides a novel approach for examining the local differentiation of neural representations, and demonstrates that well-learned words have greater representational differentiation than less well-learned or unfamiliar words.

Indexed as

ReadingAdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetPattern Recognition, VisualPsycholinguisticsYoung AdultFusiform gyrusHcorrHeterogeneityHregOrthographicReadingVWFA

Identifiers

PMID30076891
PMCPMC6231415
OpenAlexW2887384827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.