Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30076690›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2018

The impact of a radiologist-led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy.

Shivani Kumar, Lois Holloway, Dale Roach, Elise Pogson, Jacqueline Veera, Vikneswary Batumalai, Karen Lim, Geoff P Delaney, Elizabeth Lazarus, Nira Borok and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shivani KumarSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5095-4289
Lois HollowaySouth Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Dale RoachSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5541-5217
Elise PogsonLiverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Jacqueline VeeraPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Vikneswary BatumalaiSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Karen LimSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4861-2108
Geoff P DelaneySouth Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth LazarusDepartment of Radiology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Nira BorokDepartment of Radiology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Daniel MosesDepartment of Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael G JamesonSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Shalini VinodSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Cancer Australia APP1033237National Breast Cancer Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for target volume delineation in radiotherapy due to its superior soft tissue visualisation compared to computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a radiologist-led workshop on inter-observer variability in volume delineation on MRI.

methodsData from three separate studies evaluating the impact of MRI in lung, breast and cervix were collated. At pre-workshop evaluation, observers involved in each clinical site were instructed to delineate specified volumes. Radiologists specialising in each cancer site conducted an interactive workshop on interpretation of images and anatomy for each clinical site. At post-workshop evaluation, observers repeated delineation a minimum of 2 weeks after the workshops. Inter-observer variability was evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and volume similarity (VOLSIM) index comparing reference and observer volumes.

resultsPost-workshop primary gross tumour volumes (GTV) were smaller than pre-workshop volumes for lung with a mean percentage reduction of 10.4%. Breast clinical target volumes (CTV) were similar but seroma volumes were smaller post-workshop on both supine (65% reduction) and prone MRI (73% reduction). Based on DSC scores, improvement in inter-observer variability was seen for the seroma cavity volume on prone MRI with a reduction in DSC score range from 0.4-0.8 to 0.7-0.9. Breast CTV demonstrated good inter-observer variability scores (mean DSC 0.9) for both pre- and post-workshop. Post-workshop observer delineated cervix GTV was smaller than pre-workshop by 26.9%.

conclusionA radiologist-led workshop did not significantly reduce inter-observer variability in volume delineation for the three clinical sites. However, some improvement was noted in delineation of breast CTV, seroma volumes and cervix GTV.

Indexed as

EducationMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiologistsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansLung NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedUncertaintyEducationinter-observer variabilityMRItarget volume delineationtraining

Identifiers

PMID30076690
PMCPMC6275253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.