Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30076631›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2018

Essential diseases in prescribing: A national Delphi study towards a core curriculum in pharmacotherapy education.

B H E Jansen, G W Disselhorst, T Schutte, B Jansen, R Rissmann, M C Richir, C J P W Keijsers, F H M Vanmolkot, A Maassen van den Brink, C Kramers and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

B H E JansenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam.ORCID 0000-0003-2107-145X
G W DisselhorstDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam.ORCID 0000-0002-8403-5838
T SchutteDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam.ORCID 0000-0002-4096-0917
B JansenDepartment of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam.
R RissmannCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden & Leiden University Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0002-5867-9090
M C RichirDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam.
C J P W KeijsersDepartment of Geriatrics, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch.
F H M VanmolkotDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht UMC.
A Maassen van den BrinkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, Vascular and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam.
C KramersDepartment of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Radboud MC, Nijmegen.
A M VondelingDepartment of Geriatrics, Division of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, UMC, Utrecht.
G J H DumontAcademic Medical Center, Amsterdam.
I de Waard-SiebingaFaculty of Medicine, Division Pharmacology, University of Groningen.
M A Van AgtmaelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam.
J TichelaarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPrescribing is a core skill for junior doctors, yet 8-10% of their prescriptions contain errors. To ensure adequate training in prescribing, it is important to define the diseases for which junior doctors should be competent to prescribe. The aim of the present study was therefore to identify the essential diseases in prescribing for junior doctors.

methodsA two-round Delphi consensus study was conducted among medical specialists, general practitioners, junior doctors, pharmacists and pharmacotherapy teachers from all eight academic hospitals in the Netherlands. Using a five-point Likert scale, the participants indicated for each item on an initial questionnaire whether it should be considered an essential disease for junior doctors. The items for which ≥80% of all respondents agreed or strongly agreed were accepted as essential diseases.

resultsSixty-two participants completed the Delphi survey. In total, 63 of 220 items were considered to be essential diseases.

conclusionThis is the first Delphi consensus study identifying exact conditions that junior doctors must be able to prescribe for. The essential diseases can be used for training in prescribing and assessment of junior doctors' prescribing competence.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAdultConsensusCurriculumDelphi TechniqueDrug TherapyEducation, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleMedical Staff, HospitalNetherlandsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and Questionnairesmedical educationpharmacotherapyprescribing

Identifiers

PMID30076631
PMCPMC6177701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.