Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30076584›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Characteristics and outcomes of elderly patients with diffuse gliomas: a multi-institutional cohort study by Kansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors.

Takahiro Sasaki, Junya Fukai, Yoshinori Kodama, Takanori Hirose, Yoshiko Okita, Shusuke Moriuchi, Masahiro Nonaka, Naohiro Tsuyuguchi, Yuzo Terakawa, Takehiro Uda and 16 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prognostic Impact of the Combination ofJournal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Cancers · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Takahiro SasakiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Kimiidera 811-1, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
Junya FukaiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Kimiidera 811-1, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan. junfukai@wakayama-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7103-8493
Yoshinori KodamaKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Takanori HiroseKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshiko OkitaKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Shusuke MoriuchiKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiro NonakaKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Naohiro TsuyuguchiKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Yuzo TerakawaKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Takehiro UdaKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Yusuke TomoganeKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Manabu KinoshitaKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Namiko NishidaKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Shuichi IzumotoKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshikazu NakajimaKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Hideyuki AritaKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Kenichi IshibashiKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoko ShofudaKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Daisuke KanematsuKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Ema YoshiokaKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Masayuki ManoKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Koji FujitaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Kimiidera 811-1, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
Yuji UematsuDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Kimiidera 811-1, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
Naoyuki NakaoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Kimiidera 811-1, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
Kanji MoriKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.
Yonehiro KanemuraKansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study investigates the current state of clinical practice and molecular analysis for elderly patients with diffuse gliomas and aims to elucidate treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with glioblastomas.

methodsWe collected elderly cases (≥ 70 years) diagnosed with primary diffuse gliomas and enrolled in Kansai Molecular Diagnosis Network for CNS Tumors. Clinical and pathological characteristics were analyzed retrospectively. Various factors were evaluated in univariate and multivariate models to examine their effects on overall survival.

resultsIncluded in the study were 140 elderly patients (WHO grade II: 7, III: 19, IV: 114), median age was 75 years. Sixty-seven patients (47.9%) had preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score of ≥ 80. All patients underwent resection (gross-total: 20.0%, subtotal: 14.3%, partial: 39.3%, biopsy: 26.4%). Ninety-six of the patients (68.6%) received adjuvant treatment consisting of radiotherapy (RT) with temozolomide (TMZ). Seventy-eight of the patients (75.0%) received radiation dose of ≥ 50 Gy. MGMT promoter was methylated in 68 tumors (48.6%), IDH1/2 was wild-type in 129 tumors (92.1%), and TERT promoter was mutated in 78 of 128 tumors (60.9%). Median progression-free and overall survival of grade IV cases was 8.2 and 13.6 months, respectively. Higher age (≥ 80 years) and TERT promoter mutated were associated with shorter survival. Resection and adjuvant RT + TMZ were identified as independent factors for good prognosis.

conclusionsThis community-based study reveals characteristics and outcomes of elderly glioma patients in a real-world setting. Elderly patients have several potential factors for poor prognosis, but resection followed by RT + TMZ could lengthen duration of survival.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseJapanMaleMutationNeoplasm GradingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanTelomeraseTERT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsDiffuse gliomaElderlyGlioblastomaMolecular markerPrognostic factorReal-world data

Identifiers

PMID30076584
PMCPMC6244782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.