Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30076556›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2018

Patient-specific image-based bone marrow dosimetry in Lu-177-[DOTA

Astrid Gosewisch, Andreas Delker, Sebastian Tattenberg, Harun Ilhan, Andrei Todica, Julia Brosch, Lena Vomacka, Anika Brunegraf, Franz Josef Gildehaus, Sibylle Ziegler and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Dosimetry of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Joint EANM/SNMMI procedure guideline for the use ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Guideline
  3. Challenges in tracer development for tumor microenvironment (TME) imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Review
  4. Dosimetry of [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Impact of baselineEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Toward Single-Time-Point Image-Based Dosimetry ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. First-in-human dosimetry of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonist [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Astrid GosewischDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Andreas DelkerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian TattenbergDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Harun IlhanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Andrei TodicaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Julia BroschDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Lena VomackaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Anika BrunegrafDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Franz Josef GildehausDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Sibylle ZieglerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Peter BartensteinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Guido BöningDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. guido.boening@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe bone marrow (BM) is a main organ at risk in Lu-177-PSMA-617 therapy of prostate cancer and Lu-177-Octreotate therapy of neuroendocrine tumours. BM dosimetry is challenging and time-consuming, as different sequential quantitative measurements must be combined. The BM absorbed dose from the remainder of the body (ROB) can be determined from sequential whole-body planar (WB-P) imaging, while quantitative Lu-177-SPECT allows for more robust tumour and organ absorbed doses. The aim was to investigate a time-efficient and patient-friendly hybrid protocol (HP) for the ROB absorbed dose to the BM. It combines three abdominal quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) scans with a single WB-P acquisition and was compared with a reference protocol (RP) using sequential WB-P in combination with sequential QSPECT images. We investigated five patients receiving 7.4 GBq Lu-177-Octreotate and five patients treated with 3.7 GBq Lu-177-PSMA-617. Each patient had WB-P and abdominal SPECT acquisitions 24 (+ CT), 48, and 72 h post-injection. Blood samples were drawn 30 min, 80 min, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h post-injection. BM absorbed doses from the ROB were estimated from sequential WB-P images (RP), via a mono-exponential fit and mass-scaled organ-level S values. For the HP, a mono-exponential fit on the QSPECT data was scaled with the activity of one WB-P image acquired either 24, 48, or 72 h post-injection (HP24, HP48, HP72). Total BM absorbed doses were determined as a sum of ROB, blood, major organ, and tumour contributions.

resultsCompared with the RP and for Lu-177-Octreotate therapy, median differences of the total BM absorbed doses were 13% (9-17%), 8% (4-15%), and 1% (0-5%) for the HP24, HP48, and HP72, respectively. For Lu-177-PSMA-617 therapy, total BM absorbed doses deviated 10% (2-20%), 3% (0-6%), and 2% (0-6%).

conclusionFor both Lu-177-Octreotate and Lu-177-PSMA-617 therapy, BM dosimetry via sequential QSPECT imaging and a single WB-P acquisition is feasible, if this WB-P image is acquired at a late time point (48 or 72 h post-injection). The reliability of the HP can be well accepted considering the uncertainties of quantitative Lu-177 imaging and BM dosimetry using standardised organ-level S values.

Indexed as

Bone marrowDosimetryHybrid imagingLutetium-177mCRPCNETNeuroendocrine tumourOctreotateProstate cancerPSMARadionuclide therapy

Identifiers

PMID30076556
PMCPMC6081875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.