ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2018
Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Central Nervous System Angiitis.
Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflammatory Disorders of the Central Nervous System Vessels: Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Novel method using DW-MRI and ADC images to guide stereotactic biopsy for the diagnosis small primary angiitis of the central nervous system: a case report.European journal of medical research · 2021Article
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Small Vessel Childhood Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System (sv-cPACNS): An International Survey.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System - Diagnosis and Management.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewPrimary central nervous system angiitis (PCNSA) is a rare disease. Varying clinical pictures coupled with lack of sensitive and specific diagnostic tests lead to challenges in management of these patients. This unfortunately may lead to both under- or over-diagnosis and unnecessary treatment. It is important to recognize the different conditions that may mimic the clinical and radiologic presentation. We present a contemporary literature review that should update physicians who encounter this patient population. RECENT
findingsRecent additions to the literature in form of case reports and single-center series show that digital subtraction angiography was the most widely used test to diagnose PCNSA. It is also important to note that brain biopsy is still considered "gold standard" and should be pursued as it not only has information that establishes the diagnosis but also may help in ruling out the diagnosis from mimics. In around 39% of suspected cases, an alternate diagnosis was eventually confirmed highlighting the importance of a comprehensive work-up. For treatment, almost all the literature supports the use of glucocorticoids as the initial treatment and if the patient has a relapse or develops steroid toxicity then the second most commonly used agent was cyclophosphamide. There are increasing reports of benefits with other agents such as methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, infliximab, and etanercept. The diagnosis and management of PCNSA continues to be a challenge. Formation of prospective patient registries with continued immunologic research for novel targets and immunomodulatory modalities may hold promise for future care of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.