Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30076451›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2018

[Big data and artificial intelligence for diagnostic decision support in atypical dementia].

K Egger, M Rijntjes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K EggerKlinik für Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, Deutschland. karl.egger@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
M RijntjesKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differential diagnosis of atypical dementia remains difficult. The use of positron emission tomography (PET) still represents the gold standard for imaging diagnostics. According to the current evidence, however, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is almost equal to fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET, but only when using new big data and machine learning methods. In cases of atypical dementia, especially in younger patients and for follow-up, MRI is preferable to computed tomography (CT). In the clinical routine, promising MRI procedures are e. g. the automated volumetry of anatomical 3D images, as well as a non-contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion method, called arterial spin labeling (ASL). Because of the rapidly growing amount of biomarker data, there is a need for computer-aided big data analyses and artificial intelligence. Based on fast analyses of the diverse and rapidly increasing amount of clinical, imaging, epidemiological, molecular genetic and economic data, new knowledge on the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment can be generated. Technical availability, homogenization of the underlying data and the availability of large reference data are the basis for the widespread establishment of promising analytical methods.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBig DataDementiaDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18Arterial spin labellingArtificial intelligenceMachine learningPositron emission tomographyVolumetry

Identifiers

PMID30076451
OpenAlexW2886591159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.