ArticleScientific reports2018
Reciprocal Perspective for Improved Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequence-Based Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction and Its Applications in Drug Discovery.Cells · 2025Review
- Topology-driven negative sampling enhances generalizability in protein-protein interaction prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Review
- Review
- Large-scale data mining pipeline for identifying novel soybean genes involved in resistance against the soybean cyst nematode.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Review
- Struct2Graph: a graph attention network for structure based predictions of protein-protein interactions.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Reciprocal perspective as a super learner improves drug-target interaction prediction (MUSDTI).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Assessing sequence-based protein-protein interaction predictors for use in therapeutic peptide engineering.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Multi-schema computational prediction of the comprehensive SARS-CoV-2 vs. human interactome.PeerJ · 2021Article
- RPmirDIP: Reciprocal Perspective improves miRNA targeting prediction.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Protein Interface Complementarity and Gene Duplication Improve Link Prediction of Protein-Protein Interaction Network.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Network Medicine in Pathobiology.The American journal of pathology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
All protein-protein interaction (PPI) predictors require the determination of an operational decision threshold when differentiating positive PPIs from negatives. Historically, a single global threshold, typically optimized via cross-validation testing, is applied to all protein pairs. However, we here use data visualization techniques to show that no single decision threshold is suitable for all protein pairs, given the inherent diversity of protein interaction profiles. The recent development of high throughput PPI predictors has enabled the comprehensive scoring of all possible protein-protein pairs. This, in turn, has given rise to context, enabling us now to evaluate a PPI within the context of all possible predictions. Leveraging this context, we introduce a novel modeling framework called Reciprocal Perspective (RP), which estimates a localized threshold on a per-protein basis using several rank order metrics. By considering a putative PPI from the perspective of each of the proteins within the pair, RP rescores the predicted PPI and applies a cascaded Random Forest classifier leading to improvements in recall and precision. We here validate RP using two state-of-the-art PPI predictors, the Protein-protein Interaction Prediction Engine and the Scoring PRotein INTeractions methods, over five organisms: Homo sapiens, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Arabidopsis thaliana, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Mus musculus. Results demonstrate the application of a post hoc RP rescoring layer significantly improves classification (p < 0.001) in all cases over all organisms and this new rescoring approach can apply to any PPI prediction method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.