Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075818›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

The effectiveness of a sustained nurse home visiting intervention for Aboriginal infants compared with non-Aboriginal infants and with Aboriginal infants receiving usual child health care: a quasi-experimental trial - the Bulundidi Gudaga study.

Lynn Kemp, Rebekah Grace, Elizabeth Comino, Lisa Jackson Pulver, Catherine McMahon, Elizabeth Harris, Mark Harris, Ajesh George, Holly A Mack

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial ProtocolComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Community-Engaged Research in Early Home Visiting: A Scoping Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lynn KempTranslational Research and Social Innovation (TReSI), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. Lynn.Kemp@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0348-1837
Rebekah GraceTranslational Research and Social Innovation (TReSI), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Elizabeth CominoCentre for Health Equity Training Research and Evaluation, part of the Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Lisa Jackson PulverOffice of the Pro Vice Chancellor, Engagement & Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Leadership, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Catherine McMahonPsychology Department, Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University, Level 7, Room 715, C3A Building, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Elizabeth HarrisCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Mark HarrisCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Ajesh GeorgeIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research , Liverpool Hospital Locked Bag 7103, Liverpool BC, NSW, 1871, Australia.
Holly A MackTranslational Research and Social Innovation (TReSI), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AULiverpool Hospital · AUMacquarie University · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Australia there is commitment to developing interventions that will 'Close the Gap' between the health and welfare of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians and recognition that early childhood interventions offer the greatest potential for long term change. Nurse led sustained home visiting programs are considered an effective way to deliver a health and parenting service, however there is little international or Australian evidence that demonstrates the effectiveness of these programs for Aboriginal infants. This protocol describes the Bulundidi Gudaga Study, a quasi-experimental design, comparing three cohorts of families from the Macarthur region in south western Sydney to explore the effectiveness of the Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-visiting (MECSH) program for Aboriginal families.

methodsMothers were recruited when booking into the local hospital for perinatal care and families are followed up until child is age 4 years. Participants are from three distinct cohorts: Aboriginal MECSH intervention cohort (Group A), Non-Aboriginal MECSH intervention cohort (Group B) and Aboriginal non-intervention cohort (Group C). Eligible mothers were those identified as at risk during the Safe Start assessment conducted by antenatal clinic midwives. Mothers in Group A were eligible if they were pregnant with an Aboriginal infant. Mothers in Group B were eligible if they were pregnant with a non-Aboriginal infant. Mothers in Group C are part of the Gudaga descriptive cohort study and were recruited between October 2005 and May 2007. The difference in duration of breastfeeding, child body mass index, and child development outcomes at 18 months and 4 years of age will be measured as primary outcomes. We will also evaluate the intervention effect on secondary measures including: child dental health; the way the program is received; patterns of child health and illness; patterns of maternal health, health knowledge and behaviours; family and environmental conditions; and service usage for mothers and families. DISCUSSION: Involving local Aboriginal research and intervention staff and investing in established relationships between the research team and the local Aboriginal community is enabling this study to generate evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions that are feasible to implement and sustainable in the context of Aboriginal communities and local service systems.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616001721493 Registered 14 Dec 2016. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentHouse CallsPostnatal CareAustraliaBreast FeedingChild HealthChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantMaleMaternal HealthMothersParentingAustralian Aboriginal familiesChild developmentCommunity health servicesEarly interventionHome visitingMECSH programParenting educationPerinatal carePostnatal carePrimary prevention

Identifiers

PMID30075818
PMCPMC6091045
OpenAlexW2886768941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.