Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075813›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychology2018

The effectiveness of Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting for Foster Care (VIPP-FC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Nikita K Schoemaker, Gabrine Jagersma, Marije Stoltenborgh, Athanasios Maras, Harriet J Vermeer, Femmie Juffer, Lenneke R A Alink

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04244318 (Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Results of the ODISEA-T Model, in a Sample of Fathers, Mothers and/or Caregivers and Children and Adolescents Belonging to AFT Programs of La Protectora de la Infancia, Chile.), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04244318 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Results of the ODISEA-T Model, in a Sample of Fathers, Mothers and/or Caregivers and Children and Adolescents Belonging to AFT Programs of La Protectora de la Infancia, Chile.

TypeinterventionalSponsorEsteban Gómez MuzzioRan2024 to 2025Enrolled153ConditionsParent-Child Relations, Parenting, Parent-child ProblemArmsVideo-feedback ODISEA 3.0, ODISEA-DTP: parental therapy, Treatment as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fatherhood Matters: An Integrative Review of Fatherhood Intervention Research.The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Longitudinal Outcomes of Child Parent Psychotherapy: Response to Commentaries.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nikita K SchoemakerInstitute for Education and Child Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gabrine JagersmaYulius Academy, Yulius Mental Health, Barendrecht, The Netherlands.
Marije StoltenborghDepartment of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Athanasios MarasYulius Academy, Yulius Mental Health, Barendrecht, The Netherlands.
Harriet J VermeerInstitute for Education and Child Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Femmie JufferInstitute for Education and Child Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lenneke R A AlinkInstitute for Education and Child Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. alinklra@fsw.leidenuniv.nl.
Leiden University · NLYulius · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 016.145.360Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 475-11-002Stichting Kinderpostzegels Nederland 9082301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFoster children are at higher risk of the development of behavior and emotional problems, which can contribute to the development of insecure attachment bonds with their foster parents and (subsequently) to placement breakdown. Sensitive parenting might minimize the adverse effects of the behavior and emotional problems. Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline in Foster Care (VIPP-FC) is an adaptation of the evidence-based Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD) and aims at increasing sensitive parenting and the use of sensitive discipline strategies of foster parents. The current study is the first to examine the effectiveness of VIPP-FC.

methodsA randomized controlled trial is used with 60 foster parent-child dyads (intervention group n = 30, control group n = 30). The primary outcomes are parental sensitivity, parental disciplining, and parental attitudes towards parenting. Data about attachment (in)security, behavioral and emotional problems, neurobiological parameters, and possible confounders is additionally collected. DISCUSSION: Examining the effectiveness of VIPP-FC contributes to the knowledge of evidence-based prevention and intervention programs needed in foster care practice.

trial registrationNTR3899 .

Indexed as

Feedback, PsychologicalParent-Child RelationsChildChild, FosterChild, PreschoolFemaleFoster Home CareHumansMaleParentingParentsResearch DesignVideo RecordingAttachmentCoercion theoryEarly childhoodFoster careInterventionRCTSensitivityVideo feedback

Identifiers

PMID30075813
PMCPMC6091108
OpenAlexW2887387469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.